Re: Step motor torque
Posted by
Roman Black
on 2001-01-13 09:00:06 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com, "Doug Harrison" <prototype@c...>
wrote:
type of drivers are you using?
Detent torque of 42 frame motors is quite low
by comparison to smaller motors. Many people
mistake resonance problems for detent drag,
as they look and sound similar.
Now, I could be wrong, but it's possible your
system performance could be improved a lot
by using microstepping drivers.
-Roman
wrote:
> I have the 42M1150 motors. The figures are correct. These motorsare DOGS!
> The detent torque is so high it saps the life from them. Rotorinertia is
> also rather high. They won't even run with the Optistep boardbecause it
> has no ramping in jog. (You could, of course, set the rapid rate onthe
> Optistep to 3 IPM but that wouldn't be very useful either.)Doug, hope you don't mind me asking, what
>
> Go with the 34M470 motors.
type of drivers are you using?
Detent torque of 42 frame motors is quite low
by comparison to smaller motors. Many people
mistake resonance problems for detent drag,
as they look and sound similar.
Now, I could be wrong, but it's possible your
system performance could be improved a lot
by using microstepping drivers.
-Roman
Discussion Thread
Joe Vicars
2001-01-12 07:20:34 UTC
Step motor torque
Roman Black
2001-01-12 10:29:09 UTC
Re: Step motor torque
Doug Harrison
2001-01-12 15:07:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Step motor torque
Roman Black
2001-01-13 09:00:06 UTC
Re: Step motor torque
Doug Harrison
2001-01-13 10:27:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Step motor torque
Roman Black
2001-01-14 08:49:38 UTC
Re: Step motor torque
Doug Harrison
2001-01-17 14:10:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Step motor torque
Roman Black
2001-01-18 09:47:33 UTC
Re: Step motor torque
Doug Harrison
2001-01-18 14:47:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Step motor torque