CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:re:Re: gcode comments

Posted by Smoke
on 2001-01-30 21:32:45 UTC
Personally, I don't think "coalescing" the Gcodes is a good ideas.
There are quite a few Gcode numbers (as well as Mcodes) that were
SPECIFICALLY left unassigned for user.
I have a book listing all the codes. This listing is based on EIA 274-D.

>IMO, this is not the best way to approach this. We "should" try to coalesce
(gather together) the g code usage, rather than make it easy to keep it
different.


Are you refeering to "Mcodes" that can't be nailed down?

>>its the codes used to call those functions that we can't nail down

>Ballendo
>

Discussion Thread

Alan Marconett KM6VV 2001-01-25 10:55:29 UTC Re: gcode comments Jon Elson 2001-01-25 15:29:59 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: gcode comments ballendo@y... 2001-01-25 18:18:52 UTC Re: gcode comments Alan Marconett KM6VV 2001-01-25 19:09:30 UTC Re: gcode comments ballendo@y... 2001-01-25 21:20:23 UTC Re: gcode comments Ray 2001-01-26 18:35:37 UTC Re: gcode comments Alan Marconett KM6VV 2001-01-26 19:11:12 UTC Re: gcode comments ballendo@y... 2001-01-27 19:03:41 UTC Re: gcode comments Matt Shaver 2001-01-27 22:04:29 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: gcode comments Brian Pitt 2001-01-27 22:46:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: gcode comments Raymond Henry 2001-01-28 20:08:41 UTC Re: Re: gcode comments ballendo@y... 2001-01-29 16:02:45 UTC Re: gcode comments ballendo@y... 2001-01-29 16:25:38 UTC re:Re: gcode comments ballendo@y... 2001-01-29 19:37:12 UTC re:Re: Re: gcode comments Brian Pitt 2001-01-30 02:22:54 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:Re: gcode comments ballendo@y... 2001-01-30 21:14:58 UTC re:re:Re: gcode comments Smoke 2001-01-30 21:32:45 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:re:Re: gcode comments Brian Pitt 2001-01-30 23:48:17 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:re:Re: gcode comments ballendo@y... 2001-01-31 03:20:13 UTC re:re:Re: gcode comments ballendo@y... 2001-01-31 03:50:09 UTC re:re:Re: gcode comments