Re: Step resolution question, dividing head
Posted by
ballendo@y...
on 2001-03-01 01:54:35 UTC
Jon,
My first thought was the same as Peter. You sure it's only 4:1?
Since you describe 1 turn for 90 degrees, it prob'ly is...
Math seems ok, but I'd question the reliability of such fine
microsteps in this type of application. I'd look for a stepper with 1
degree steps, and use a divide by ten microstep driver. This gives me
3600 steps per rev (90 degrees), so 40 steps per degree (.025 degree
resolution). 1:1 drive.
If you can live with this resolution I think you will have a much
more reliable setup. Should cost less too!
Hope this helps.
Ballendo
P.S. If you need the increased resolution, I'd build it into the
drive ratio, NOT the microsteps!
My first thought was the same as Peter. You sure it's only 4:1?
Since you describe 1 turn for 90 degrees, it prob'ly is...
Math seems ok, but I'd question the reliability of such fine
microsteps in this type of application. I'd look for a stepper with 1
degree steps, and use a divide by ten microstep driver. This gives me
3600 steps per rev (90 degrees), so 40 steps per degree (.025 degree
resolution). 1:1 drive.
If you can live with this resolution I think you will have a much
more reliable setup. Should cost less too!
Hope this helps.
Ballendo
P.S. If you need the increased resolution, I'd build it into the
drive ratio, NOT the microsteps!
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., Jon Anderson <janders@n...> wrote:
>I'm working on setting up my Hardinge dividing head for a 4th axis.
>I think I've figured out a ratio that gives me even steps, at least
>for full degree moves, and wanted a double check that I did this
>right.
>Dividing head has 4:1 ratio, so 90 degrees per full turn of the
>handle. With 18,000 microstep resolution I get 200 steps/degree and
with a 2:1 reduction between motor and dividing head, 400 total
microsteps/degree, or .0025 deg/microstep.
> Does this look OK? I need to get the ratio settled so I can pick
exact
> timing belt pulleys, and finish designing the mounting plate.
> Thanks,Jon
Discussion Thread
Jon Anderson
2001-02-28 21:37:06 UTC
Step resolution question, dividing head
ptengin@a...
2001-03-01 01:33:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Step resolution question, dividing head
ballendo@y...
2001-03-01 01:54:35 UTC
Re: Step resolution question, dividing head
Jon Anderson
2001-03-01 07:34:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Step resolution question, dividing head
Jon Anderson
2001-03-01 07:54:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Step resolution question, dividing head
Jon Anderson
2001-03-01 10:19:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Step resolution question, dividing head
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-03-01 10:39:22 UTC
Re: Step resolution question, dividing head
Jon Anderson
2001-03-01 11:34:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Step resolution question, dividing head
Paul
2001-03-01 13:32:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Step resolution question, dividing head
ptengin@a...
2001-03-01 14:38:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Step resolution question, dividing head
Jon Anderson
2001-03-01 14:49:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Step resolution question, dividing head
Jon Anderson
2001-03-01 14:59:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Step resolution question, dividing head
ptengin@a...
2001-03-01 15:12:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Step resolution question, dividing head
machines@n...
2001-03-01 15:24:35 UTC
Re: Step resolution question, dividing head
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-03-01 20:45:36 UTC
Re: Step resolution question, dividing head
Jon Anderson
2001-03-01 20:53:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Step resolution question, dividing head
JanRwl@A...
2001-03-01 22:41:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Step resolution question, dividing head