Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: shakin!
Posted by
dave engvall
on 2001-03-01 15:04:04 UTC
LtCdr ChonBey vestai-Qul wrote:It wasn't too bad here, despite how close we are to the epicenter.
Hi Steve,
Hope the dizziness goes away....I doubt you are blond.... <ugly grin>
I may be way off base but that epicenter was 52 km deep....ie if the wave radiates...in a spherical fashion...then where you are
would give a 45 component...or steeper....ie. a lot of up-down movement rather than horizontal. This may put more members in
structures in compression which they probably survive better.....
This is just thinkin....could be all wet.
I plot the UW/USGS position at 47.2N 122.7W as Balch Passage between Anterson Is. and McNeil. Is. actually between McNeil and Eagle
Is.
Note that the position is given to 1 decimal place which may imply that the uncertainty is about a tenth of a degree which leaves a
lot of room for one claiming they were very close. ;-)
Hi Steve,
Hope the dizziness goes away....I doubt you are blond.... <ugly grin>
I may be way off base but that epicenter was 52 km deep....ie if the wave radiates...in a spherical fashion...then where you are
would give a 45 component...or steeper....ie. a lot of up-down movement rather than horizontal. This may put more members in
structures in compression which they probably survive better.....
This is just thinkin....could be all wet.
I plot the UW/USGS position at 47.2N 122.7W as Balch Passage between Anterson Is. and McNeil. Is. actually between McNeil and Eagle
Is.
Note that the position is given to 1 decimal place which may imply that the uncertainty is about a tenth of a degree which leaves a
lot of room for one claiming they were very close. ;-)
> Depends on the ground underfoot, I saw on the news that a ferry
> terminal was closed because it was all built on fill dirt and they
> want to make sure it isn't going to slide into the Sound.
>
> Steve Greenfield
>
Discussion Thread
carlcnc@s...
2001-02-28 16:29:42 UTC
shakin!
mariss92705@y...
2001-02-28 17:37:03 UTC
Re: shakin!
wanliker@a...
2001-02-28 17:51:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: shakin!
mariss92705@y...
2001-02-28 19:32:51 UTC
Re: shakin!
dave engvall
2001-02-28 19:50:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: shakin!
Brian Pitt
2001-02-28 21:43:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: shakin!
Dan Mauch
2001-03-01 06:34:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: shakin!
LtCdr ChonBey vestai-Qul
2001-03-01 12:57:56 UTC
Re: shakin!
dave engvall
2001-03-01 15:04:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: shakin!
LtCdr ChonBey vestai-Qul
2001-03-04 08:18:49 UTC
Re: shakin!