Re: shakin!
Posted by
LtCdr ChonBey vestai-Qul
on 2001-03-04 08:18:49 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., dave engvall <dengvall@e...> wrote:
distance away. My understanding is that Seattle and Olympia got hit
harder because a lot of them are built on old mud/ash flows, and
Tacoma is on mostly bedrock.
I suppose we've been OT enough now...
Steve Greenfield
> LtCdr ChonBey vestai-Qul wrote:It wasn't too bad here, despite howclose we are to the epicenter.
> I may be way off base but that epicenter was 52 km deep....ie if thewave radiates...in a spherical fashion...then where you are
> would give a 45 component...or steeper....ie. a lot of up-downmovement rather than horizontal. This may put more members in
> structures in compression which they probably survive better.....Olympia got hit hard, though, seems to me they are about the same
> This is just thinkin....could be all wet.
distance away. My understanding is that Seattle and Olympia got hit
harder because a lot of them are built on old mud/ash flows, and
Tacoma is on mostly bedrock.
I suppose we've been OT enough now...
Steve Greenfield
Discussion Thread
carlcnc@s...
2001-02-28 16:29:42 UTC
shakin!
mariss92705@y...
2001-02-28 17:37:03 UTC
Re: shakin!
wanliker@a...
2001-02-28 17:51:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: shakin!
mariss92705@y...
2001-02-28 19:32:51 UTC
Re: shakin!
dave engvall
2001-02-28 19:50:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: shakin!
Brian Pitt
2001-02-28 21:43:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: shakin!
Dan Mauch
2001-03-01 06:34:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: shakin!
LtCdr ChonBey vestai-Qul
2001-03-01 12:57:56 UTC
Re: shakin!
dave engvall
2001-03-01 15:04:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: shakin!
LtCdr ChonBey vestai-Qul
2001-03-04 08:18:49 UTC
Re: shakin!