Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] First angle and Third angle
Posted by
Matt Shaver
on 2001-03-25 23:08:12 UTC
Smoke wrote:
that it's based on 10. Most of the metric proponents say that a decimal
system is superior because it makes floating point calculations easier.
What I think they overlook is that designers don't really do that much
floating point math. What designers want is to be able to say, "Let's
divide this thing up into thirds (or quarters)". A measurement system
based on 12 is much easier to use because it's evenly divisible in more
ways than 10.
Matt
P.S. And another thing, what about time? Anyone want to put in an 8 hour
day when the whole day is only 10 hours ;), I guess they could make it
up to me with a four day weekend in the new 10 day week...
> Historically it runs something like....with all the millions (billions?) ofI'll chime in real quick here! The problem with the metric system is
> products already created using the ENGLISH (not American) system, if
> everyone changed 100% to metric, all those old products would (eventually)
> be impossible to fix (without making cutom parts) since there wouldn't be
> any parts available for them.
>
> I'm sure there are lots of other factors involved but I'd guess this isn't
> the place to discuss them all.
that it's based on 10. Most of the metric proponents say that a decimal
system is superior because it makes floating point calculations easier.
What I think they overlook is that designers don't really do that much
floating point math. What designers want is to be able to say, "Let's
divide this thing up into thirds (or quarters)". A measurement system
based on 12 is much easier to use because it's evenly divisible in more
ways than 10.
Matt
P.S. And another thing, what about time? Anyone want to put in an 8 hour
day when the whole day is only 10 hours ;), I guess they could make it
up to me with a four day weekend in the new 10 day week...
Discussion Thread
Peter Chen
2001-03-24 15:13:42 UTC
First angle and Third angle
John Stevenson
2001-03-24 15:48:15 UTC
Re: First angle and Third angle
Ian Wright
2001-03-24 16:25:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] First angle and Third angle
Smoke
2001-03-25 09:42:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] First angle and Third angle
Matt Shaver
2001-03-25 23:08:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] First angle and Third angle
Smoke
2001-03-26 11:31:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] First angle and Third angle
Art Fenerty
2001-03-26 11:45:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] First angle and Third angle
Tim Goldstein
2001-03-26 11:51:41 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] First angle and Third angle
Smoke
2001-03-26 12:13:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] First angle and Third angle
Art Fenerty
2001-03-26 14:01:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] First angle and Third angle
jesse
2001-03-26 18:23:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] First angle and Third angle
Jerry Kimberlin
2001-03-26 18:29:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] First angle and Third angle
Matt Shaver
2001-03-26 23:29:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] First angle and Third angle
Vance Buhler
2001-03-27 00:34:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] First angle and Third angle
e.heritage@b...
2001-03-27 08:57:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] First angle and Third angle
Graham Hollis
2001-03-27 10:09:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] First angle and Third angle
John Stevenson
2001-03-27 11:06:20 UTC
Re: First angle and Third angle
Ian Wright
2001-03-27 12:04:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] First angle and Third angle
Art Fenerty
2001-03-27 15:56:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] First angle and Third angle
Ian Wright
2001-03-28 02:52:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] First angle and Third angle
Ray
2001-03-28 06:48:21 UTC
Re: Re: First angle and Third angle
Tony Jeffree
2001-03-28 23:44:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] First angle and Third angle
Ian Wright
2001-03-29 00:54:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] First angle and Third angle
dave engvall
2001-04-02 21:23:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] First angle and Third angle
dave engvall
2001-04-02 21:31:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] First angle and Third angle