Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: BoBCad Question
Posted by
Smoke
on 2001-05-07 13:27:21 UTC
m98 is a call to a program(not a sub-routine). P1 is the program number
m99 at the end of program P1 is the return command.
Smoke
-----Original Message-----
From: Art Fenerty <fenerty@...>
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Monday, May 07, 2001 1:08 PM
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: BoBCad Question
m99 at the end of program P1 is the return command.
Smoke
-----Original Message-----
From: Art Fenerty <fenerty@...>
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Monday, May 07, 2001 1:08 PM
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: BoBCad Question
>I gues the reason I asked, is that my flashcut customer seems to be using adiscussion of shop built systems, for CAD, CAM, EDM, and DRO.
>canned cycle that used such things as
>
>M98 P1
>
>which seems to call a subroutine that is specified at the end of the G-Code
>file in the form.
>
>O1
>G00Z.05
>n10 G00X-1Y-3
>...
>M99
>
> What exactly is this form, it doesn't conform to any thing else I've
>seen. EMC does support the usual G80-G89 canned cycle codes, but what is
>this M98P1 stuff, I suspect its a macro declaration. Can BobCad put out
>regulat Canned cycles??
>
>Thanks,
>Art
>
>
>
>
>Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list for the
>
>Addresses:
>Post message: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
>Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
>Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
>URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>bill,
>List Manager
>
>FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
Discussion Thread
Art Fenerty
2001-05-05 08:47:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] BoBCad Question
cnc002@a...
2001-05-06 07:07:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] BoBCad Question
Ray
2001-05-06 20:51:56 UTC
Re: Re: BoBCad Question
cnc002@a...
2001-05-07 07:40:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: BoBCad Question
Art Fenerty
2001-05-07 12:08:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: BoBCad Question
Smoke
2001-05-07 13:27:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: BoBCad Question
ballendo@y...
2001-05-08 03:57:09 UTC
Re: BoBCad Question
cnc002@a...
2001-05-08 04:06:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: BoBCad Question
ballendo@y...
2001-05-08 04:10:24 UTC
EMC interpreter was Re: BoBCad Question
Art Fenerty
2001-05-08 06:17:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC interpreter was Re: BoBCad Question
cnc002@a...
2001-05-08 07:29:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC interpreter was Re: BoBCad Question
cnc002@a...
2001-05-08 08:10:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC interpreter was Re: BoBCad Question
Fred Smith
2001-05-08 08:22:36 UTC
EMC interpreter was Re: BoBCad Question
Fred Smith
2001-05-08 08:50:14 UTC
EMC interpreter was Re: BoBCad Question
Jon Elson
2001-05-08 09:44:06 UTC
BoBCad Question
Art Fenerty
2001-05-08 12:20:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] BoBCad Question
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-05-08 13:00:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC interpreter was Re: BoBCad Question
Art Fenerty
2001-05-08 14:01:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC interpreter was Re: BoBCad Question
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-05-08 16:11:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC interpreter was Re: BoBCad Question
Art Fenerty
2001-05-08 17:05:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC interpreter was Re: BoBCad Question
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-05-08 18:10:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC interpreter was Re: BoBCad Question
ballendo@y...
2001-05-08 20:03:43 UTC
canned cycles was EMC interpreter was Re: BoBCad Question
Ray
2001-05-09 12:14:10 UTC
Re: Re: EMC interpreter was Re: BoBCad Question
Mike
2001-05-09 12:19:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] canned cycles was EMC interpreter was Re: BoBCad Question
Jon Elson
2001-05-13 23:37:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: EMC interpreter was Re: BoBCad Question