Re: BoBCad Question
Posted by
ballendo@y...
on 2001-05-08 03:57:09 UTC
Art,
This is subroutine structure. Actually sub-program structure, since
the sub is defined the same as a regular program; i.e., the letter O
to begin.
M98 is a sub call command (think gosub in BASIC) and M99 is the
return.
P1 are the "gosub" params...
P stands for program, and 1 is the program number. Simple stuff. Very
useful.
Hope this helps.
Ballendo
P.S. Macro call will often be G65.
P.P.S. Bobcad can be set up for "std" canned cycles, AIRC (As I
ReCall). Will look it up if needed...
This is subroutine structure. Actually sub-program structure, since
the sub is defined the same as a regular program; i.e., the letter O
to begin.
M98 is a sub call command (think gosub in BASIC) and M99 is the
return.
P1 are the "gosub" params...
P stands for program, and 1 is the program number. Simple stuff. Very
useful.
Hope this helps.
Ballendo
P.S. Macro call will often be G65.
P.P.S. Bobcad can be set up for "std" canned cycles, AIRC (As I
ReCall). Will look it up if needed...
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "Art Fenerty" <fenerty@h...> wrote:
> I gues the reason I asked, is that my flashcut customer seems to be
using a
> canned cycle that used such things as
>
> M98 P1
>
> which seems to call a subroutine that is specified at the end of
the G-Code
> file in the form.
>
> O1
> G00Z.05
> n10 G00X-1Y-3
> ...
> M99
>
>What exactly is this form, it doesn't conform to any thing else I've
>seen. EMC does support the usual G80-G89 canned cycle codes, but
>what is this M98P1 stuff, I suspect its a macro declaration. Can
BobCad put out regular Canned cycles??
>
> Thanks,
> Art
Discussion Thread
Art Fenerty
2001-05-05 08:47:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] BoBCad Question
cnc002@a...
2001-05-06 07:07:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] BoBCad Question
Ray
2001-05-06 20:51:56 UTC
Re: Re: BoBCad Question
cnc002@a...
2001-05-07 07:40:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: BoBCad Question
Art Fenerty
2001-05-07 12:08:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: BoBCad Question
Smoke
2001-05-07 13:27:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: BoBCad Question
ballendo@y...
2001-05-08 03:57:09 UTC
Re: BoBCad Question
cnc002@a...
2001-05-08 04:06:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: BoBCad Question
ballendo@y...
2001-05-08 04:10:24 UTC
EMC interpreter was Re: BoBCad Question
Art Fenerty
2001-05-08 06:17:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC interpreter was Re: BoBCad Question
cnc002@a...
2001-05-08 07:29:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC interpreter was Re: BoBCad Question
cnc002@a...
2001-05-08 08:10:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC interpreter was Re: BoBCad Question
Fred Smith
2001-05-08 08:22:36 UTC
EMC interpreter was Re: BoBCad Question
Fred Smith
2001-05-08 08:50:14 UTC
EMC interpreter was Re: BoBCad Question
Jon Elson
2001-05-08 09:44:06 UTC
BoBCad Question
Art Fenerty
2001-05-08 12:20:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] BoBCad Question
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-05-08 13:00:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC interpreter was Re: BoBCad Question
Art Fenerty
2001-05-08 14:01:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC interpreter was Re: BoBCad Question
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-05-08 16:11:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC interpreter was Re: BoBCad Question
Art Fenerty
2001-05-08 17:05:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC interpreter was Re: BoBCad Question
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-05-08 18:10:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC interpreter was Re: BoBCad Question
ballendo@y...
2001-05-08 20:03:43 UTC
canned cycles was EMC interpreter was Re: BoBCad Question
Ray
2001-05-09 12:14:10 UTC
Re: Re: EMC interpreter was Re: BoBCad Question
Mike
2001-05-09 12:19:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] canned cycles was EMC interpreter was Re: BoBCad Question
Jon Elson
2001-05-13 23:37:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: EMC interpreter was Re: BoBCad Question