Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EMC G1 problem.
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2001-06-01 14:58:04 UTC
Art Fenerty wrote:
that also has at least one axis word, ie. that specifies a movement. So, what
you are saying is that it generates a "silent" error? I suspect that
is some sort of mistake, somthing that doesn't run, but produces no
message to tell you why.
Jon
> Hi Guys:I believe the spec is that G01, G02 and G03 commands must be in a block
> I just noticed something strange on the EMC 6-axis kernel.
>
> the following code:
>
> G1 F10
> X1 Y1 Z1
> X2 Y2 Z2
>
> will not work or generate an EMC error. It will work if the G1 is placed on
> the same line as in G1 X1 Y1 Z1. I have traced the code and it seems this is
> not a mistake but rather a design thing. Is this right? Should this happen
> on the EMC kernel? The previous 3-axis kernel would have generated an error
> I think (G1 with no coordinates error).
> I was wondering if anyone knew if this was normal.
that also has at least one axis word, ie. that specifies a movement. So, what
you are saying is that it generates a "silent" error? I suspect that
is some sort of mistake, somthing that doesn't run, but produces no
message to tell you why.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Art Fenerty
2001-06-01 13:39:02 UTC
Re: EMC G1 problem.
Jon Elson
2001-06-01 14:58:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EMC G1 problem.
Art Fenerty
2001-06-01 15:18:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EMC G1 problem.
Ray
2001-06-02 07:43:44 UTC
Re: Re: Re: EMC G1 problem.
William Scalione
2001-06-02 22:59:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: EMC G1 problem.
dave engvall
2001-06-03 22:48:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: Re: EMC G1 problem.
Ray
2001-06-05 16:45:08 UTC
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: EMC G1 problem.