CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: Re: EMC G1 problem.

Posted by dave engvall
on 2001-06-03 22:48:08 UTC
Ray wrote:

Well maybe not. Someplace back up in the code you gave it a G1, it found a X position value and parsed the Z and then a -
sign....which may have defaulted to a - 0.0 in Z.
Clearly if the minus sign had not been there then it should have reported a null value or token but since it found something it may
have not known the difference.
Indeed, ideally, it should test for a finite value of the argument but....

Dave

>
> >Seems like EMC should have given an error message though.
>
> I'll vote for that!!! Thanks for the info.
>
> Ray
>

Discussion Thread

Art Fenerty 2001-06-01 13:39:02 UTC Re: EMC G1 problem. Jon Elson 2001-06-01 14:58:04 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EMC G1 problem. Art Fenerty 2001-06-01 15:18:03 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EMC G1 problem. Ray 2001-06-02 07:43:44 UTC Re: Re: Re: EMC G1 problem. William Scalione 2001-06-02 22:59:04 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: EMC G1 problem. dave engvall 2001-06-03 22:48:08 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: Re: EMC G1 problem. Ray 2001-06-05 16:45:08 UTC Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: EMC G1 problem.