Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridget
Posted by
Sven Peter, TAD S.A.
on 2001-06-24 10:24:55 UTC
Tim Goldstein wrote:I have on hand for 16000 steps per inch
from 5:1 to 10:1 brings you in a reasonable working resolution.
I don't think you should go under the 200 steps.
Good luck
Sven Peter
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> requiring only 16000 steps per second at my target speed and giving a stepTaking in account a relation from encoder signals to positioning resolution
> dimension of .0000625 which is plenty. I would actually like to use a 100
> line encoder but figure I should use what I have instead of spending another
> $80 or so to get one from US Digital.
>
> Tim
> [Denver, CO]
from 5:1 to 10:1 brings you in a reasonable working resolution.
I don't think you should go under the 200 steps.
Good luck
Sven Peter
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
Sven Peter, TAD S.A.
2001-06-23 21:50:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridget
Tim Goldstein
2001-06-23 23:20:09 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridget
Sven Peter, TAD S.A.
2001-06-24 06:46:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridget
Tim Goldstein
2001-06-24 09:58:26 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridget
Sven Peter, TAD S.A.
2001-06-24 10:24:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridget
Brian Pitt
2001-06-24 14:33:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridget
ballendo@y...
2001-06-26 04:10:49 UTC
Re: Bridget