Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] 4th Axis Concept (long)
Posted by
Chris Luebke
on 2001-08-06 11:21:28 UTC
Alan,
Lets go thru some of your ideas.........
especially if there is some form of tension or part that is offset from the
axis centerline like a crankshaft (crankshaft ??? what are you trying to do
??? Just illustrating!).
part to be machined based on the hole in the disk from the getgo. I'm gonna
print and then consider this more..........
old washstand. Flat spots for mortises and then rails to other legs.
however add a bit to the overall project. I really think you could apply some
fairly smooth motion for engagement with an air cylinder, sure you now need
air, but who really doesnt have that if you have a CNC machine?
I am going to rip apart a floppy disk right now !
Thanks,
Chris
Lets go thru some of your ideas.........
> >>>Look at the bottom of a 3.5" floppy disk, and the spindle in theI think the D shaped shaft may be a little tricky to engage and disengage,
> drive, that is by far the most common similar arrangement. I can see
> doing this, simply picture a stepper shaft with a half flat D, out to
> disengage, just barely touching (may need spring loading, may be doable
> without) and spin the shaft to find engagement, then in the rest of the
> way in to engage..
> I don't see an easy way to engage/disengage without having another
> small stepper to screw it in and out. You might could make a solenoid
> system that'd work, but I think an extra stepper would be more
> reliable. Easy enough to do a small PIC chip system to do this, all
> you'd need is an engage/disengage signal, and wait a reasonable time
> after the engage signal for it to get locked up..<<<
especially if there is some form of tension or part that is offset from the
axis centerline like a crankshaft (crankshaft ??? what are you trying to do
??? Just illustrating!).
>I gotta think about this......... I think we would then need to index the
>
> >>>But, I can also see a better way. Use any clutch system, not
> indexed. Much simpler, just has to be locking type clutch so it won't
> slip, should be a lot easier to find one of these that will work. Then
> have an index wheel on the shaft somewhere, just a plastic wheel with a
> hole in it, and an opto-interupter. After the engage signal, send the
> command for a little more than one rev, at a low speed, then a wait
> period of that long again. Then just have a PIC chip so after the
> engage, it looks for the index hole. Soon as it sees the index hole, it
> disconnects the step signal for a fixed 1 rev time (that's why you need
> the extra wait time, the motor won't see pulses for up to one rev time
> afterwards if it sees the hole near the end of the first rev). Then
> you'll be set to the index hole, and the pic won't interrupt the signal
> again for anything until another disconnect/reconnect.<<<<
part to be machined based on the hole in the disk from the getgo. I'm gonna
print and then consider this more..........
>I am picturing the versatility of keeping Square ends, like the legs of an
> >>>> Another question to ask, is absolute positioning really needed? If
> totally lathed, it wouldn't be at all, everything is relative around the
> piece. If you want to leave some areas square and have the work in the
> round match up to the square portions, it will be, OR use a larger
> starting block and machine it square after doing the round, but that'd
> be a bit wastefull. But if you're machining it square anyways, you
> really wouldn't need indexing, just good motion afterwards..<<<
old washstand. Flat spots for mortises and then rails to other legs.
>I like the idea of an additional stepper motor for engagement. It does
> >>>All in all I'd say it's easy enough to do, and you really wouldn't
> need a large stepper to control the engagement. Give it some leverage
> and I bet a surplus floppy drive motor would work great to move a much
> larger motor in and out, certainly a NEMA 23 type would be enough for
> most anything..<<<
however add a bit to the overall project. I really think you could apply some
fairly smooth motion for engagement with an air cylinder, sure you now need
air, but who really doesnt have that if you have a CNC machine?
I am going to rip apart a floppy disk right now !
Thanks,
Chris
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
>
> Post messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
> URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> bill,
> List Manager
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Discussion Thread
datac@l...
2001-08-05 21:17:05 UTC
4th Axis Concept (long)
alenz@c...
2001-08-05 23:41:47 UTC
Re: 4th Axis Concept (long)
Chris Luebke
2001-08-06 06:51:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: 4th Axis Concept (long)
vrsculptor@h...
2001-08-06 07:39:50 UTC
Re: 4th Axis Concept (long)
Chris Luebke
2001-08-06 09:05:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: 4th Axis Concept (long)
Fred Smith
2001-08-06 09:09:08 UTC
Re: 4th Axis Concept (long)
Alan King
2001-08-06 09:17:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] 4th Axis Concept (long)
Chris Luebke
2001-08-06 11:10:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: 4th Axis Concept (long)
Chris Luebke
2001-08-06 11:21:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] 4th Axis Concept (long)
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-08-06 11:42:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: 4th Axis Concept (long)
jguenther@v...
2001-08-06 11:59:59 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: 4th Axis Concept (long)
Chris Luebke
2001-08-06 14:53:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: 4th Axis Concept (long)
IMService
2001-08-06 16:36:20 UTC
Re:Re: Re: 4th Axis Concept (long)
Alan King
2001-08-06 16:42:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] 4th Axis Concept (long)
Chris L
2001-08-06 17:12:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Re: Re: 4th Axis Concept (long)
Fred Smith
2001-08-06 18:23:51 UTC
Re:Re: Re: 4th Axis Concept (long)
Alan King
2001-08-06 18:27:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: 4th Axis Concept (long)
Ray
2001-08-06 18:28:25 UTC
Re: Re: Re: 4th Axis Concept (long)
vrsculptor@h...
2001-08-06 18:40:05 UTC
Re:Re: Re: 4th Axis Concept (long)
Chris L
2001-08-06 20:14:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: 4th Axis Concept (long)
Chris L
2001-08-06 20:16:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Re: Re: 4th Axis Concept (long)
Jon Elson
2001-08-06 20:19:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: 4th Axis Concept (long)
Chris L
2001-08-06 20:24:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Re: Re: 4th Axis Concept (long)
alenz@c...
2001-08-06 21:23:33 UTC
Re:Re: Re: 4th Axis Concept (long)
Alan King
2001-08-06 21:25:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Re: Re: 4th Axis Concept (long)
allan_r9@h...
2001-08-07 21:07:51 UTC
Re:Re: Re: 4th Axis Concept (long)
tony@j...
2001-08-08 02:17:35 UTC
Re: 4th Axis Concept (long)
Ian Wright
2001-08-08 02:28:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Re: Re: 4th Axis Concept (long)
Chris Luebke
2001-08-08 10:06:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Re: Re: 4th Axis Concept (long)
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-08-08 10:25:27 UTC
Re: 4th Axis Concept (long)
tony@j...
2001-08-08 13:59:53 UTC
Re: 4th Axis Concept (long)
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-08-08 15:47:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: 4th Axis Concept (long)
Larry Edington
2001-08-08 16:41:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: 4th Axis Concept (long)
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-08-08 21:37:02 UTC
Re: 4th Axis Concept (long)