Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Yahoo Groups Problems?????
Posted by
Matt Shaver
on 2001-11-06 18:37:30 UTC
ccs@... wrote:
except some hand deleted spam. It exists as a single unix style mailbox
file of approximately 156MB. I'll send it to your personal e-mail
address as an attachment for safe keeping, you should get it in the next
few minutes ... ;)
online and at 28.8, 33.6, or (if I can ever get it) 53K they'd be alot
better than they were at 1200 baud. Add html support and a cheap
unlimited long distance calling plan and it would'nt be THAT bad. Kind
of a batch mode internet.
Better than going back though would be to go forward to an 802.11
wireless network. As this whole post is OT, I'll just refer you to:
http://www.freenetworks.org/
or you could search Google for "Wi-Fi" or "neighborhood area network",
that is, while you still can...
Matt
> I don't know... maybe it's time to figure out how to write anI've got the whole thing in individual e-mails from 6 MAY 99 forward
> article-snarfer agent and create a backu
>
>> No one has replied to my post about what might be happening with those
>> groups which have had their archive "deleted"? And whether we (CCED)
>> are "protected" against a yahoo "mistake" or worse...
>>
>> Ballendo
>>
except some hand deleted spam. It exists as a single unix style mailbox
file of approximately 156MB. I'll send it to your personal e-mail
address as an attachment for safe keeping, you should get it in the next
few minutes ... ;)
>>I'd go back to the old way if need be, BBSes could be brought back
>> <snip> Should yahoo become unusuable, I would be willing to help setup
>> a
>> computer to serve this and perhaps several other related lists, and
>> I'm sure I would not be the only such volunteer amongst our
>> membership. Those of us who remember the pre-commercial internet
>>
>> use things like yahoo with a degree of amusement, and stand ready to go
>> back to the old ways if the dot-com bubble completely bursts
>>
>>>
>>> Chris Stratton
>>
online and at 28.8, 33.6, or (if I can ever get it) 53K they'd be alot
better than they were at 1200 baud. Add html support and a cheap
unlimited long distance calling plan and it would'nt be THAT bad. Kind
of a batch mode internet.
Better than going back though would be to go forward to an 802.11
wireless network. As this whole post is OT, I'll just refer you to:
http://www.freenetworks.org/
or you could search Google for "Wi-Fi" or "neighborhood area network",
that is, while you still can...
Matt
Discussion Thread
cmsteam@a...
2001-11-06 05:47:24 UTC
Yahoo Groups Problems?????
cncdxf@a...
2001-11-06 06:40:46 UTC
Re: Yahoo Groups Problems?????
Jon Anderson
2001-11-06 06:53:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Yahoo Groups Problems?????
cncdxf@a...
2001-11-06 07:28:25 UTC
Re: Yahoo Groups Problems?????
dlantz@a...
2001-11-06 07:33:31 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Yahoo Groups Problems?????
cncdxf@a...
2001-11-06 07:54:01 UTC
Re: Yahoo Groups Problems?????
Jon Anderson
2001-11-06 08:06:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Yahoo Groups Problems?????
Jon Anderson
2001-11-06 08:11:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Yahoo Groups Problems?????
ccs@m...
2001-11-06 09:27:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Yahoo Groups Problems?????
ballendo@y...
2001-11-06 16:31:11 UTC
internet slippery slope was Re: Yahoo Groups Problems?????
ballendo@y...
2001-11-06 16:39:17 UTC
Re: Yahoo Groups Problems?????
cncdxf@a...
2001-11-06 16:47:05 UTC
internet slippery slope was Re: Yahoo Groups Problems?????
ccs@m...
2001-11-06 17:03:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Yahoo Groups Problems?????
ccs@m...
2001-11-06 17:05:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] internet slippery slope was Re: Yahoo Groups Problems?????
ballendo@y...
2001-11-06 17:13:14 UTC
Re: Yahoo Groups Problems?????
Matt Shaver
2001-11-06 18:37:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Yahoo Groups Problems?????
Darrell Daniels
2001-11-06 18:40:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Yahoo Groups Problems?????