Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] is 210 oz/in way overkill for a Sherline
Posted by
JanRwl@A...
on 2001-11-28 16:35:20 UTC
In a message dated 27-Nov-01 23:45:59 Central Standard Time, mszollar@...
writes:
home-brew CNC lathes in '78 and '84, both with Size-34 "unipolar" Sup.Elec.
steppers, and they were "OK", but one had to "learn how to limit what was
demanded of them". Then, a year back, I built a third, exactly the same,
except with "same-size" bipolar Size-34 S.E. motors (and THEIR
driver/power-supply), and the result is FAR more torque, fewer "missed steps"
or "phantom -"where did THAT come from?"" steps, etc. I am too ignernt to
know why. It's just better! These new "same size" motors have about twice
the torque as the ones I previously used. Jan Rowland
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
writes:
> ? Is there any truth to being 210 vs. 155, vs.Ken: I am not sure what your question is, here. I built a couple of
> 110, vs. 60?
>
home-brew CNC lathes in '78 and '84, both with Size-34 "unipolar" Sup.Elec.
steppers, and they were "OK", but one had to "learn how to limit what was
demanded of them". Then, a year back, I built a third, exactly the same,
except with "same-size" bipolar Size-34 S.E. motors (and THEIR
driver/power-supply), and the result is FAR more torque, fewer "missed steps"
or "phantom -"where did THAT come from?"" steps, etc. I am too ignernt to
know why. It's just better! These new "same size" motors have about twice
the torque as the ones I previously used. Jan Rowland
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
mszollar@g...
2001-11-27 21:44:24 UTC
is 210 oz/in way overkill for a Sherline
Tony Jeffree
2001-11-28 02:44:58 UTC
Re: is 210 oz/in way overkill for a Sherline
ccs@m...
2001-11-28 07:15:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] is 210 oz/in way overkill for a Sherline
Tim
2001-11-28 08:39:20 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] is 210 oz/in way overkill for a Sherline
JanRwl@A...
2001-11-28 16:35:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] is 210 oz/in way overkill for a Sherline