Re: "Attachments killer"
Posted by
Tony Jeffree
on 2001-12-02 03:32:59 UTC
At 10:13 02/12/2001 +0000, you wrote:
suitable retalliation...
Regards,
Tony
>I guess what is really needed is a good and foolproof way ofI don't think spamming them is quite what most of us have in mind as
>tracing viruses back to their source so we can all then spam their
>creators!!
suitable retalliation...
Regards,
Tony
Discussion Thread
Gene Christianson
2001-12-01 15:44:50 UTC
"Attachments killer"
Bill Vance
2001-12-01 16:26:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] "Attachments killer"
Fredrik Krook
2001-12-01 16:34:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] "Attachments killer"
Mike Partain
2001-12-01 17:10:01 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] "Attachments killer"
Ian Wright
2001-12-02 01:39:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] "Attachments killer"
Tony Jeffree
2001-12-02 03:32:59 UTC
Re: "Attachments killer"
Michael Milligan
2001-12-02 04:43:36 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: "Attachments killer"
Smoke
2001-12-02 07:54:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] "Attachments killer"
Mike Partain
2001-12-02 08:06:59 UTC
OT: RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] "Attachments killer"
Smoke
2001-12-02 08:23:25 UTC
Re: RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] "Attachments killer"
wanliker@a...
2001-12-02 08:40:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] "Attachments killer"
Marcus & Eva
2001-12-02 13:55:11 UTC
Re: RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] "Attachments killer"
Scott A. Stephens
2001-12-02 13:59:48 UTC
Re: RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] "Attachments killer"
carlcnc@y...
2001-12-02 14:04:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] "Attachments killer"
Jon Elson
2001-12-02 21:45:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] "Attachments killer"