Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Cam only? Was: re: BobCAD/CAM v.s. Dolphin CAD/CAM
Posted by
Craig Chamberlin
on 2002-01-02 15:39:25 UTC
As well as Ashlar-Vellum's line of modeling packages...Cobalt, Xenon,
and Argon. They don't do CAM, but Cobalt does include CAD, with the
others it is optional.
They are also available for the Mac.
http://www.ashlar-vellum.com
Just a user:)
Craig
imserv1 wrote:
and Argon. They don't do CAM, but Cobalt does include CAD, with the
others it is optional.
They are also available for the Mac.
http://www.ashlar-vellum.com
Just a user:)
Craig
imserv1 wrote:
>
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "John Schwab" <johns@m...> wrote:
> > I've been following the discussion on which programs to use, but
> i've seen
> > most of them and personally the all have terrible modelers. I'm
> use to
> > Rhino, Catia, Unigraphics, Autocadd, ect..
>
> You are dropping names like flies here, but have listed Autocad as a
> modeler. How can that be considered a modeler? Even Rhino is barely
> capable of being called a modeler, as it doesn't really support
> solids, but is surface based.
>
> Have you looked at Prodesktop? It is truly free in that it does not
> require bimonthly re-registration like the so called "free" Surfcam.
> It is also a parametric based modeler and can communicate with Pro-E,
> also somehow missing from your list of familiar programs. Pro-D
> includes bidirectional iges translators which should more than
> satisfy your NURBS craving. It will also allow you to save stl files
> at just about any required surface tolerance, which is a perfect
> match for the needs of StlWork. Just think a Nurbs based parametric
> solid/surface modeler and a CAM system to match for just the price of
> StlWork!
>
> Even Rhino can save quite satisfactory stl files for use with StlWork.
>
> If you want to have an integrated modeling and Cam environment, you
> will have to be prepared to spend over $3000 for the likes of Xcam,
> 1CNC, Visualmill, etc. They are all on the low end of capabilities
> compared to the likes of a Catia or UG system.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Fred smith
> IMService
>
> We are THE source for low cost Cad-Cam
> Group stuff at: http://www.vectorcam.com/cced2.html
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
>
> Post messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
> URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> bill,
> List Manager
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Discussion Thread
John Schwab
2002-01-02 14:31:04 UTC
Cam only? Was: re: BobCAD/CAM v.s. Dolphin CAD/CAM
Tim
2002-01-02 14:42:32 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Cam only? Was: re: BobCAD/CAM v.s. Dolphin CAD/CAM
imserv1
2002-01-02 15:22:26 UTC
Re: Cam only? Was: re: BobCAD/CAM v.s. Dolphin CAD/CAM
Craig Chamberlin
2002-01-02 15:39:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Cam only? Was: re: BobCAD/CAM v.s. Dolphin CAD/CAM
John Schwab
2002-01-02 16:33:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Cam only? Was: re: BobCAD/CAM v.s. Dolphin CAD/CAM
thosmurray
2002-01-02 20:39:38 UTC
Them's fightin' wurds Was: Re: Cam only? Was: re: BobCAD/CAM...
John Schwab
2002-01-02 21:18:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Them's fightin' wurds Was: Re: Cam only? Was: re: BobCAD/CAM...
imserv1
2002-01-02 22:13:33 UTC
Them's fightin' wurds Was: Re: Cam only? Was: re: BobCAD/CAM...
thosmurray
2002-01-03 20:54:51 UTC
RhinoCAM? It could happen...
rainnea
2002-01-04 07:05:56 UTC
Re: RhinoCAM? It could happen...