Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Windows and black boxes
Posted by
Alan Marconett KM6VV
on 2002-01-26 10:37:37 UTC
Hi Jerry,
There are CF card to IDE adapters that would allow a DOS boot, and
automatically run a subset of a controller. IMO, the Gcode parser
should be left on the PC, and only a buffered stream of motion commands
sent to the SBC. The motion commands sent to the SBC should be
"vanilla" as possible.
The MCU.PAS (or the equivalent) module is the way to do it. Just add a
buffered comm driver routine to accept the motion commands.
Alan KM6VV
Carol & Jerry Jankura wrote:
There are CF card to IDE adapters that would allow a DOS boot, and
automatically run a subset of a controller. IMO, the Gcode parser
should be left on the PC, and only a buffered stream of motion commands
sent to the SBC. The motion commands sent to the SBC should be
"vanilla" as possible.
The MCU.PAS (or the equivalent) module is the way to do it. Just add a
buffered comm driver routine to accept the motion commands.
Alan KM6VV
Carol & Jerry Jankura wrote:
>
> Bert:
>
> A couple of things:
>
> First, The PC without monitor or keyboard would not require a hard drive
> either, so essentially you'd have the "single board computer" that has been
> proposed on this list.
>
> Second, something like TurboCNC would work nicely on this machine. However,
> it would not be the same TurboCNC that Dave currently offers. TurboCNC would
> be revised to be rom based (or to load into RAM on the SBC) It would have
> the human interface removed and would have a few commands which would be
> executed on command from an RS-232 port, such as execute a G-Code or
> configure the machine. This would be a neat system, and could serve as the
> Black Box.
>
> This would be similar to what CompuMotor does for their motor driver cards
> that fit into a PC. You simply download the executable to their "special
> purpose computer" (FYI, the one I used was 68000K based) and then execute
> the commands. It worked really well then, and should work well now.
>
> This would be a neat project, as a $10 bill is the admission fee to get the
> source for TurboCNC to use as a base and Dave's already done a lot of the
> work.
>
Discussion Thread
ron ginger
2002-01-25 04:48:51 UTC
Windows and black boxes
ccs@m...
2002-01-25 05:48:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Windows and black boxes
mariss92705
2002-01-25 08:34:44 UTC
Re: Windows and black boxes
Bert Pirson
2002-01-25 10:32:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Windows and black boxes
CL
2002-01-25 11:04:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Windows and black boxes
j.guenther
2002-01-25 11:41:50 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Windows and black boxes
hllrsr@c...
2002-01-25 14:13:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Windows and black boxes
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2002-01-25 14:18:44 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Windows and black boxes
mariss92705
2002-01-25 14:38:59 UTC
Re: Windows and black boxes
stevenson_engineers
2002-01-25 15:11:10 UTC
Re: Windows and black boxes
Art Fenerty
2002-01-25 17:13:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Windows and black boxes
mariss92705
2002-01-25 18:58:45 UTC
Re: Windows and black boxes
Art Fenerty
2002-01-25 19:15:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Windows and black boxes
Russell Shaw
2002-01-25 20:02:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Windows and black boxes
Jon Elson
2002-01-25 22:30:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Windows and black boxes
hllrsr@c...
2002-01-25 22:55:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Windows and black boxes
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-01-26 10:37:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Windows and black boxes
ballendo
2002-01-27 05:07:42 UTC
Re: Windows and black boxes
ballendo
2002-01-27 05:30:42 UTC
Concatenate vs. CP vs. CVV was Re: Windows and black boxes