CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Windows and black boxes

on 2002-01-26 10:37:37 UTC
Hi Jerry,

There are CF card to IDE adapters that would allow a DOS boot, and
automatically run a subset of a controller. IMO, the Gcode parser
should be left on the PC, and only a buffered stream of motion commands
sent to the SBC. The motion commands sent to the SBC should be
"vanilla" as possible.

The MCU.PAS (or the equivalent) module is the way to do it. Just add a
buffered comm driver routine to accept the motion commands.

Alan KM6VV

Carol & Jerry Jankura wrote:
>
> Bert:
>
> A couple of things:
>
> First, The PC without monitor or keyboard would not require a hard drive
> either, so essentially you'd have the "single board computer" that has been
> proposed on this list.
>
> Second, something like TurboCNC would work nicely on this machine. However,
> it would not be the same TurboCNC that Dave currently offers. TurboCNC would
> be revised to be rom based (or to load into RAM on the SBC) It would have
> the human interface removed and would have a few commands which would be
> executed on command from an RS-232 port, such as execute a G-Code or
> configure the machine. This would be a neat system, and could serve as the
> Black Box.
>
> This would be similar to what CompuMotor does for their motor driver cards
> that fit into a PC. You simply download the executable to their "special
> purpose computer" (FYI, the one I used was 68000K based) and then execute
> the commands. It worked really well then, and should work well now.
>
> This would be a neat project, as a $10 bill is the admission fee to get the
> source for TurboCNC to use as a base and Dave's already done a lot of the
> work.
>

Discussion Thread

ron ginger 2002-01-25 04:48:51 UTC Windows and black boxes ccs@m... 2002-01-25 05:48:19 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Windows and black boxes mariss92705 2002-01-25 08:34:44 UTC Re: Windows and black boxes Bert Pirson 2002-01-25 10:32:08 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Windows and black boxes CL 2002-01-25 11:04:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Windows and black boxes j.guenther 2002-01-25 11:41:50 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Windows and black boxes hllrsr@c... 2002-01-25 14:13:36 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Windows and black boxes Carol & Jerry Jankura 2002-01-25 14:18:44 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Windows and black boxes mariss92705 2002-01-25 14:38:59 UTC Re: Windows and black boxes stevenson_engineers 2002-01-25 15:11:10 UTC Re: Windows and black boxes Art Fenerty 2002-01-25 17:13:00 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Windows and black boxes mariss92705 2002-01-25 18:58:45 UTC Re: Windows and black boxes Art Fenerty 2002-01-25 19:15:56 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Windows and black boxes Russell Shaw 2002-01-25 20:02:45 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Windows and black boxes Jon Elson 2002-01-25 22:30:07 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Windows and black boxes hllrsr@c... 2002-01-25 22:55:39 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Windows and black boxes Alan Marconett KM6VV 2002-01-26 10:37:37 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Windows and black boxes ballendo 2002-01-27 05:07:42 UTC Re: Windows and black boxes ballendo 2002-01-27 05:30:42 UTC Concatenate vs. CP vs. CVV was Re: Windows and black boxes