Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] I'm impressed. Anyone want to write the G-Code for this?
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2002-02-01 22:36:33 UTC
valrox1 wrote:
milling machine, then, yes. I think it could all be done on a lathe,
with a lot of repositioning. A fixture to hold it might be helpful there,
as
you have to turn it a bunch of times. The ID of the bores looks cylindrical
to me, but I can't be sure. I think you'd do the bores starting from the
smallest diameter and deepest, and then work outward, sort of burning
your bridges as you go, as the last of 6 bores is done, the inner part
is left weakly supported. But, then you won't be stressing it any more, as
you will be working on the next cube outward.
On a CNC mill, you could probably do all the bores on one face at a time,
only having to position the part 6 times. The last face might be tricky,
requiring slower feed to avoid bending the outer cube, although it looks
like it has enough material to be fairly rigid.
I might have to try one of these, sometime!
Jon
> http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1508773813Actually, I'm not sure you need CNC to do this. If it was all done on a
milling machine, then, yes. I think it could all be done on a lathe,
with a lot of repositioning. A fixture to hold it might be helpful there,
as
you have to turn it a bunch of times. The ID of the bores looks cylindrical
to me, but I can't be sure. I think you'd do the bores starting from the
smallest diameter and deepest, and then work outward, sort of burning
your bridges as you go, as the last of 6 bores is done, the inner part
is left weakly supported. But, then you won't be stressing it any more, as
you will be working on the next cube outward.
On a CNC mill, you could probably do all the bores on one face at a time,
only having to position the part 6 times. The last face might be tricky,
requiring slower feed to avoid bending the outer cube, although it looks
like it has enough material to be fairly rigid.
I might have to try one of these, sometime!
Jon
Discussion Thread
valrox1
2002-02-01 13:52:31 UTC
I'm impressed. Anyone want to write the G-Code for this?
stevenson_engineers
2002-02-01 14:22:28 UTC
Re: I'm impressed. Anyone want to write the G-Code for this?
methadras
2002-02-01 15:27:51 UTC
Re: I'm impressed. Anyone want to write the G-Code for this?
Smoke
2002-02-01 15:33:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] I'm impressed. Anyone want to write the G-Code for this?
beer@s...
2002-02-01 16:02:50 UTC
Re: I'm impressed. Anyone want to write the G-Code for this?
bilg63475
2002-02-01 17:36:46 UTC
Re: I'm impressed. Anyone want to write the G-Code for this?
Alan Rothenbush
2002-02-01 20:38:54 UTC
Re:Re: I'm impressed. Anyone want to write the G-Code for this?
Smoke
2002-02-01 20:49:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Re: I'm impressed. Anyone want to write the G-Code for this?
doug98105
2002-02-01 21:40:52 UTC
Re:Re: I'm impressed. Anyone want to write the G-Code for this?
Smoke
2002-02-01 22:05:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Re: I'm impressed. Anyone want to write the G-Code for this?
Jon Elson
2002-02-01 22:36:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] I'm impressed. Anyone want to write the G-Code for this?
Lloyd Leung
2002-02-02 00:15:58 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Re: I'm impressed. Anyone want to write the G-Code for this?
A&K ERWOOD
2002-02-02 02:11:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Re: I'm impressed. Anyone want to write the G-Code for this?
ron ginger
2002-02-02 07:01:49 UTC
Re: I'm impressed. Anyone want to write the G-Code for this?
Smoke
2002-02-02 08:20:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re:Re: I'm impressed. Anyone want to write the G-Code for this?
yethdear0
2002-02-02 12:31:56 UTC
Re:Re: I'm impressed. Anyone want to write the G-Code for this?
ballendo
2002-02-03 01:17:52 UTC
Re:Re: I'm impressed. Anyone want to write the G-Code for this?