CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: EMC and new Redhat.

Posted by Fred Proctor
on 1999-11-15 08:54:31 UTC
Ian Wright wrote:

> I've just been looking to download the RT-linux patch and I can't locate the
> Beta16 version on the FSM Labs site. It looks like they are happy with it
> and have renamed it RTlinux-2.0

Yes. The beta16 patch was indicated as being the candidate for RT Linux
2.0. I don't know if there is any difference between the two. I haven't
downloaded the 2.0 patch and tried it.

Also:

> but there appears to be 2 versions which has
> confused me a little. There is a straight RTlinux-2.0.tgz at around 1/2MB
> and an RTlinux-2.0-prepatched.tgz at around 15MB so I'm not sure which would
> be best.

The smaller file is RT Linux: the patch, the module source code, and the
examples.

The larger file is the pristine Linux kernel source tree, already
patched for you. This saves you the trouble of going to www.kernel.org
to get the pristine sources and then patching it yourself. If you
download this, *don't* patch it again. Just skip the patch step and
proceed with making the RT Linux modules, examples, etc.

--Fred

Discussion Thread

Ian Wright 1999-11-09 10:40:53 UTC EMC and new Redhat. Brian L. 1999-11-09 12:44:26 UTC Re: EMC and new Redhat. Ian Wright 1999-11-09 14:32:56 UTC Re: EMC and new Redhat. Fred Proctor 1999-11-10 07:47:06 UTC Re: EMC and new Redhat. Brian L. 1999-11-10 21:54:39 UTC Re: EMC and new Redhat. Ian Wright 1999-11-11 13:33:30 UTC Re: EMC and new Redhat. Ian Wright 1999-11-13 02:23:54 UTC Re: EMC and new Redhat. Fred Proctor 1999-11-15 08:54:31 UTC Re: EMC and new Redhat.