Re: Sorry
Posted by
garfield@x...
on 1999-05-25 19:39:32 UTC
On Tue, 25 May 1999 21:31:09 -0500, William Scalione <scalione@...>
wrote:
head janitor Obie Wan, that as long as the stuff was directly related to CNC
parts, it was acceptable? I'm NOT tryna start an argument, if I misunderstood; I
respect the opines of group and especially El Janitoro, but I *thot* it was
pretty much decided to allow such focused "for sales".
Did I miss sumpin?
Gar
wrote:
>I want to apologize to everyone in the group for postingUh, did I miss sumpin, or wasn't it the consensus as well as the opinion of the
>my for sale list here. I got so many private e-mail requests
>for a list of items that I was kind of snowed under. One of
>the requests came through the group and I just hit the reply
>key as I had done with all of the others. I ment that as a
>private e-mail but screwed up. sorry again
head janitor Obie Wan, that as long as the stuff was directly related to CNC
parts, it was acceptable? I'm NOT tryna start an argument, if I misunderstood; I
respect the opines of group and especially El Janitoro, but I *thot* it was
pretty much decided to allow such focused "for sales".
Did I miss sumpin?
Gar
Discussion Thread
William Scalione
1999-05-25 19:31:09 UTC
Sorry
garfield@x...
1999-05-25 19:39:32 UTC
Re: Sorry
Dan Mauch
1999-05-26 05:56:26 UTC
Re: Sorry
Charles Gallo
1999-10-13 15:15:30 UTC
Sorry
a_k@a...
2001-07-24 04:24:32 UTC
Sorry
hanson_whitey
2009-03-03 23:35:34 UTC
Sorry
Andy Wander
2009-03-04 05:50:20 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Sorry
whitey
2009-03-04 07:14:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Sorry
Yahoo
2009-03-04 08:31:57 UTC
Re: Sorry
whitey
2009-03-04 08:51:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Sorry
caudlet
2009-03-04 10:00:22 UTC
Re: Sorry
gcode fi (hanermo)
2009-03-04 10:17:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Sorry
Alan Marconett
2009-03-04 10:31:32 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Sorry
whitey
2009-03-04 13:07:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Sorry