CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: Gecko 2xx "Nema 42 modification"???

Posted by methadras
on 2002-02-27 11:07:50 UTC
since you are direct coupling your motors to the lead screw, are you
using a helicoil type coupling or something a little more beefy...?

> I'd be interested if Mariss can answer this one on-list. My
experience
> with G210's running 1870oz-in NEMA42's has been extremely
positive. My
> motors are direct coupled (no belts) to the three axes of a BP-
clone and
> I have not experienced any motor growl. Only problem I had was
that I
> was losing position accuracy due to a bug in the step rate
multiplier
> PCB when set to 5 step/microstep i.e. X2. Once the step mult.
board was
> replaced n/c under warranty, they have performed flawlessly.
>
> You do have to be careful about your acceleration rates - if you
try to
> accelerate too fast, the stepper will "spit the dummy" (an Aussie
> expression - U.S. translation: "spit the pacifier"... anyone who's
had a
> baby will know what I mean) and just sit there buzzing. I have my
big
> machine (runs a Flashcut controller) set at 7500 steps per second
per
> second acceleration. I have set top speed rapid at 2.2 meters per
> minute (U.S. translation: 86 IPM) I can go faster (110 IPM) but the
> motor has very little torque at such high speed.
>
> Your motors should be fine for the RF31 . I also have a Busy Bee
Mill
> Drill with ~500oz-in servo motors direct driven and get acceptable
> performance although things get a little tight at the ends of the
table
> travel. This (busy bee) machine still has the original acme
leadscrew
> threads rather than ball screws (on the big machine) which I do
> recommend you consider fitting. The last two issues of HSM discuss
this.
>
> Cheers, Peter
>
>
> Paul R. Hvidston wrote:
>
> > Question for the group:
> >
> > I Fired off a question to Geckodrives, but users on the list
might also have
> > had experience with this one and I could use all the input I can
get.
> >
> > I purchased three large steppers on eBay recently (SIGMA 20-
4247TD200-F1.3,
> > and hopefully I didn't make a real bad purchase) so I could start
playing
> > around CNC-ing my RF31. The seller said that a previous customer
used Geckos
> > with a NEMA 42 modification. The explanation I received was:
> >
> > "These steppers work FLAWLESSLY with gecko stepperdrivers with
the nema 42
> > modification.
> > I had a lot of trouble with intermitent stalling with drivers
purchased
> > without the nema 42 modification."
> >
> > "as it was "explained" to me, the nema 42 motor's are designed to
run in a
> > different RPM / torque range. the Mid band stabilization circuit
on
> > standard gecko drivers can get "saturated" causing that annoying
motor growl
> > (phase lock) and subsequent positioning error. since replacing
the standard
> > gecko driver with the modified drivers all my axis (especially
the Y axis
> > which carries the beam) run perfectly. the Modified drivers cost
the same
> > as the standard, but they do have a distinct label engraved on
them. The
> > guy who developed the gecko driver is the guy I spoke with, and
he was very
> > helpful"
> >
> > The published ratings for the motors are:
> >
> > 200 step
> > 540 oz-in @ 50 sps
> > 635 oz-in holding
> > 22.6 oz-in detent torque
> > 5.0 Amp phase current
> > 1.29 ohms phase resistance
> > 2.2 mH phase inductance
> > 17.4 oz-in^2 rotor inertia
> > 10 lbs. weight, 30 watts dissipation, 8-wire
> >
> > Anybody know about this?
> >
> > Thanks all,
> >
> > Paul R. Hvidston, N6MGN
> > ACKSYS Engineering
> > Upland, CA
> >
> >
> > Addresses:
> > FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> > FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> >
> > OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> > http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
> > http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
> >
> > Post messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y...
> > Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@y...
> > Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@y...
> > List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@y..., wanliker@a...
> > Moderator: jmelson@a... timg@k... [Moderator]
> > URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> > bill,
> > List Mom
> > List Owner
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
> >

Discussion Thread

Paul R. Hvidston 2002-02-26 19:53:15 UTC Gecko 2xx "Nema 42 modification"??? Peter 2002-02-27 08:29:53 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gecko 2xx "Nema 42 modification"??? Paul R. Hvidston 2002-02-27 08:50:27 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gecko 2xx "Nema 42 modification"??? Peter 2002-02-27 10:02:13 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gecko 2xx "Nema 42 modification"??? CL 2002-02-27 10:34:13 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gecko 2xx "Nema 42 modification"??? Paul R. Hvidston 2002-02-27 10:39:54 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gecko 2xx "Nema 42 modification"??? methadras 2002-02-27 11:07:50 UTC Re: Gecko 2xx "Nema 42 modification"??? methadras 2002-02-27 11:09:00 UTC Re: Gecko 2xx "Nema 42 modification"??? Peter 2002-02-27 11:48:52 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gecko 2xx "Nema 42 modification"??? Drew Rogge 2002-02-27 11:54:14 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gecko 2xx "Nema 42 modification"??? mariss92705 2002-02-27 12:32:06 UTC Re: Gecko 2xx "Nema 42 modification"??? Paul R. Hvidston 2002-02-27 12:32:41 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gecko 2xx "Nema 42 modification"??? Paul R. Hvidston 2002-02-27 12:48:37 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Gecko 2xx "Nema 42 modification"??? Alan Marconett KM6VV 2002-02-27 13:10:26 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gecko 2xx "Nema 42 modification"??? Paul R. Hvidston 2002-02-27 13:35:54 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gecko 2xx "Nema 42 modification"??? Alan Marconett KM6VV 2002-02-27 13:54:53 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gecko 2xx "Nema 42 modification"??? Peter 2002-02-27 17:14:15 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gecko 2xx "Nema 42 modification"???