CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: Gecko 2xx "Nema 42 modification"???

Posted by methadras
on 2002-02-27 11:09:00 UTC
well, them ignore my original question, now that i've read this exact
message... hehehe, that was a little amusing...

> When I said direct coupled, I should have made it clear that the
motor
> is connected to the leadscrew via a Heli-Cal brand helical motor
> coupler. This is a zero backlash "spring" that allows for a bit of
> alignment error. They're not cheap but they work great.
>
> I just posted 3 pics in the main Photos folder which show the
motors
> mounted (the X-axis photo best shows the coupling) and one showing
the
> Geckos. Files are named NEMA42... and Gecko Drive...
>
> Cheers, Peter
>
>
>
> Paul R. Hvidston wrote:
>
> > Peter,
> >
> > Interesting you're running 1870oz-in NEMA42's with stock(?)
210's. Maybe you
> > just got lucky and the direct connection (no belts) damps any
instability
> > for you. I've got the original CNC conversion articles in
HSM's "Projects
> > Seven", and am eagerly reading the new series in HSM.
> >
> > In response to my query to Geckodrives, I got a couple of speedy
(but
> > non-technical) replies:
> >
> > ---
> > Dear Mr. Hvidston,
> >
> > The G210 drive can be modified at the factory to run a size 42
motor. After
> > the modification, it would be unsuitable for small size 23
steppers.
> >
> > Dear Mr. Hvidston,
> >
> > The size 42 modification is not considered reversible, unless you
have
> > surface mount technology available.
> >
> > To purchase the G210's with this modification, you need only
specify "42
> > modification". There is no charge.
> > ---
> >
> > The Gecko folks seem very responsive, and the products sound
great. I'll be
> > ordering some 210's to run these motors. I was hoping to get a
little more
> > technical info out of them on the mod since I might want to un-
modify them
> > down the road, and I do have SMT rework capability.
> >
> > I got the big motors to use in various test-beds. First use may
be on an
> > RF-31 "play-pen", then use them on a 3-axis wood carver using a
3HP router.
> > Ultimately, the RF-31 will use servos and ball-screws, but for
now it's
> > play-time.
> >
> > Thanks for the input.
> >
> > Paul R. Hvidston, N6MGN
> > ACKSYS Engineering
> > Upland, CA
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Peter" <prenolds@s...>
> > To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y...>
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 8:31 AM
> > Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gecko 2xx "Nema 42 modification"???
> >
> >
> >
> >>I'd be interested if Mariss can answer this one on-list. My
experience
> >>with G210's running 1870oz-in NEMA42's has been extremely
positive. My
> >>motors are direct coupled (no belts) to the three axes of a BP-
clone and
> >>I have not experienced any motor growl. Only problem I had was
that I
> >>was losing position accuracy due to a bug in the step rate
multiplier
> >>PCB when set to 5 step/microstep i.e. X2. Once the step mult.
board was
> >>replaced n/c under warranty, they have performed flawlessly.
> >>
> >>You do have to be careful about your acceleration rates - if you
try to
> >>accelerate too fast, the stepper will "spit the dummy" (an Aussie
> >>expression - U.S. translation: "spit the pacifier"... anyone
who's had a
> >>baby will know what I mean) and just sit there buzzing. I have
my big
> >>machine (runs a Flashcut controller) set at 7500 steps per second
per
> >>second acceleration. I have set top speed rapid at 2.2 meters per
> >>minute (U.S. translation: 86 IPM) I can go faster (110 IPM) but
the
> >>motor has very little torque at such high speed.
> >>
> >>Your motors should be fine for the RF31 . I also have a Busy Bee
Mill
> >>Drill with ~500oz-in servo motors direct driven and get acceptable
> >>performance although things get a little tight at the ends of the
table
> >>travel. This (busy bee) machine still has the original acme
leadscrew
> >>threads rather than ball screws (on the big machine) which I do
> >>recommend you consider fitting. The last two issues of HSM
discuss this.
> >>
> >>Cheers, Peter
> >>
> >>
> >>Paul R. Hvidston wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Question for the group:
> >>>
> >>>I Fired off a question to Geckodrives, but users on the list
might also
> >>>
> > have
> >
> >>>had experience with this one and I could use all the input I can
get.
> >>>
> >>>I purchased three large steppers on eBay recently (SIGMA
> >>>
> > 20-4247TD200-F1.3,
> >
> >>>and hopefully I didn't make a real bad purchase) so I could start
> >>>
> > playing
> >
> >>>around CNC-ing my RF31. The seller said that a previous customer
used
> >>>
> > Geckos
> >
> >>>with a NEMA 42 modification. The explanation I received was:
> >>>
> >>>"These steppers work FLAWLESSLY with gecko stepperdrivers with
the nema
> >>>
> > 42
> >
> >>>modification.
> >>>I had a lot of trouble with intermitent stalling with drivers
purchased
> >>>without the nema 42 modification."
> >>>
> >>>"as it was "explained" to me, the nema 42 motor's are designed
to run in
> >>>
> > a
> >
> >>>different RPM / torque range. the Mid band stabilization
circuit on
> >>>standard gecko drivers can get "saturated" causing that annoying
motor
> >>>
> > growl
> >
> >>>(phase lock) and subsequent positioning error. since replacing
the
> >>>
> > standard
> >
> >>>gecko driver with the modified drivers all my axis (especially
the Y
> >>>
> > axis
> >
> >>>which carries the beam) run perfectly. the Modified drivers
cost the
> >>>
> > same
> >
> >>>as the standard, but they do have a distinct label engraved on
them.
> >>>
> > The
> >
> >>>guy who developed the gecko driver is the guy I spoke with, and
he was
> >>>
> > very
> >
> >>>helpful"
> >>>
> >>>The published ratings for the motors are:
> >>>
> >>>200 step
> >>>540 oz-in @ 50 sps
> >>>635 oz-in holding
> >>>22.6 oz-in detent torque
> >>>5.0 Amp phase current
> >>>1.29 ohms phase resistance
> >>>2.2 mH phase inductance
> >>>17.4 oz-in^2 rotor inertia
> >>>10 lbs. weight, 30 watts dissipation, 8-wire
> >>>
> >>>Anybody know about this?
> >>>
> >>>Thanks all,
> >>>
> >>>Paul R. Hvidston, N6MGN
> >>>ACKSYS Engineering
> >>>Upland, CA
> >>>
> >
> >
> >
> > Addresses:
> > FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> > FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> >
> > OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> > http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
> > http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
> >
> > Post messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y...
> > Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@y...
> > Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@y...
> > List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@y..., wanliker@a...
> > Moderator: jmelson@a... timg@k... [Moderator]
> > URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> > bill,
> > List Mom
> > List Owner
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
> >

Discussion Thread

Paul R. Hvidston 2002-02-26 19:53:15 UTC Gecko 2xx "Nema 42 modification"??? Peter 2002-02-27 08:29:53 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gecko 2xx "Nema 42 modification"??? Paul R. Hvidston 2002-02-27 08:50:27 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gecko 2xx "Nema 42 modification"??? Peter 2002-02-27 10:02:13 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gecko 2xx "Nema 42 modification"??? CL 2002-02-27 10:34:13 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gecko 2xx "Nema 42 modification"??? Paul R. Hvidston 2002-02-27 10:39:54 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gecko 2xx "Nema 42 modification"??? methadras 2002-02-27 11:07:50 UTC Re: Gecko 2xx "Nema 42 modification"??? methadras 2002-02-27 11:09:00 UTC Re: Gecko 2xx "Nema 42 modification"??? Peter 2002-02-27 11:48:52 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gecko 2xx "Nema 42 modification"??? Drew Rogge 2002-02-27 11:54:14 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gecko 2xx "Nema 42 modification"??? mariss92705 2002-02-27 12:32:06 UTC Re: Gecko 2xx "Nema 42 modification"??? Paul R. Hvidston 2002-02-27 12:32:41 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gecko 2xx "Nema 42 modification"??? Paul R. Hvidston 2002-02-27 12:48:37 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Gecko 2xx "Nema 42 modification"??? Alan Marconett KM6VV 2002-02-27 13:10:26 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gecko 2xx "Nema 42 modification"??? Paul R. Hvidston 2002-02-27 13:35:54 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gecko 2xx "Nema 42 modification"??? Alan Marconett KM6VV 2002-02-27 13:54:53 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gecko 2xx "Nema 42 modification"??? Peter 2002-02-27 17:14:15 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gecko 2xx "Nema 42 modification"???