Re: Re: December build of EMC
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 1999-12-14 13:22:34 UTC
Ray Henry wrote:
table is moving over 60 IPM, at which time the belt starts to whir and creak.
At really slow speeds, they DON'T have any interesting 'gait'. Just smooth
motion down to .01"/min. Below .01 IPM, the stick/slip friction makes the
motion a little lumpy.
a little, to make more time available to the non-real time tasks.
Jon
> From: Ray Henry <rehenry@...>Yeah, that's what they all think! But, my machine is totally quiet until the
>
> I didn't have quite the same problem here. The ten step micro drivers I
> use must make a difference. The motors sounded a bit like servos, (sorry
> Jon E) really sweet at high speed. They had an interesting gait at really
> slow speeds.
table is moving over 60 IPM, at which time the belt starts to whir and creak.
At really slow speeds, they DON'T have any interesting 'gait'. Just smooth
motion down to .01"/min. Below .01 IPM, the stick/slip friction makes the
motion a little lumpy.
> The rt was a real processor hog. I could see a real screen refresh warNo, you probably have the interrupt rate set too high. Back it off just
> going on between linux and rt with some pauses from half to whole seconds.
> May be a problem with my patch.
a little, to make more time available to the non-real time tasks.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Tim Goldstein
1999-12-12 22:16:07 UTC
December build of EMC
Matt Shaver
1999-12-13 08:10:00 UTC
Re: December build of EMC
Harrison, Doug
1999-12-13 10:11:07 UTC
RE: December build of EMC
Jon Elson
1999-12-13 15:46:59 UTC
Re: December build of EMC
Ray Henry
1999-12-14 05:25:16 UTC
Re: December build of EMC
Jon Elson
1999-12-14 13:22:34 UTC
Re: Re: December build of EMC