Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Laser DRO ??
Posted by
Bill Vance
on 2002-04-01 18:38:44 UTC
On Mon Apr 1 17:21:47 2002, baccus61, <rich5886@...> wrote:
problem, but a sensor problem. Last I heard, there's no sensor diodes, or
transistors, etc., that are up to doing the speed needed for super high
resolution, and the resolution itself returns less and less signal strength, the
tighter the resolution gets. From what I see from time to time, that's
something that continues to improve, but needs more work to catch up.
Now that's not to say that lasers/sensors ar unusable for our purposes, they
patently are. However, buy mouse crap, get mouse crap.....:-)
Bill
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
RKBA! ***** Blessings On Thee, Oh Israel! ***** 4-19!
----------------+----------+--------------------------+---------------------
An _EFFECTIVE_ | Insured | All matter is vibration. | Let he who hath no
weapon in every | by COLT; | -- Max Plank | weapon sell his
hand = Freedom | DIAL | In the beginning was the | garment and buy a
on every side! | 1911-A1. | word. -- The Bible | sword.--Jesus Christ
----------------+----------+--------------------------+---------------------
Constitutional Government is dead, LONG LIVE THE CONSTITUTION!!!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Hi gang,Two things; Speed and resolution are working against it. That's not a laser
> I have been reading with interest all the posts on the digital
>readouts and just had a thought. Has anyone thought of using the
>laser mouse for a cheap DRO? These work on almost any surface and
>seem to have a fair resolution but would the resolution be great
>enough for the task at hand! I have one pulled apart that was fried
>in a power surge (along with the rest of my computer) and there
>isn't much to it.
>Just a thought and what do you all think?
>Rich.
problem, but a sensor problem. Last I heard, there's no sensor diodes, or
transistors, etc., that are up to doing the speed needed for super high
resolution, and the resolution itself returns less and less signal strength, the
tighter the resolution gets. From what I see from time to time, that's
something that continues to improve, but needs more work to catch up.
Now that's not to say that lasers/sensors ar unusable for our purposes, they
patently are. However, buy mouse crap, get mouse crap.....:-)
Bill
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
RKBA! ***** Blessings On Thee, Oh Israel! ***** 4-19!
----------------+----------+--------------------------+---------------------
An _EFFECTIVE_ | Insured | All matter is vibration. | Let he who hath no
weapon in every | by COLT; | -- Max Plank | weapon sell his
hand = Freedom | DIAL | In the beginning was the | garment and buy a
on every side! | 1911-A1. | word. -- The Bible | sword.--Jesus Christ
----------------+----------+--------------------------+---------------------
Constitutional Government is dead, LONG LIVE THE CONSTITUTION!!!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Discussion Thread
baccus61
2002-04-01 17:21:48 UTC
Laser DRO ??
Bill Vance
2002-04-01 18:38:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Laser DRO ??
Jerry Biehler
2002-04-02 14:17:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Laser DRO ??
Jerry Biehler
2002-04-02 14:20:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Laser DRO ??
Jerry Biehler
2002-04-02 14:55:00 UTC
5 phase vexta
Paul Weber
2002-04-02 15:00:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Laser DRO ??
rcstickman
2002-04-02 15:18:32 UTC
Re: 5 phase vexta
RC
2002-04-02 15:26:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] 5 phase vexta
Bill Vance
2002-04-02 19:53:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Laser DRO ??
Jon Elson
2002-04-02 22:02:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] 5 phase vexta