Re: Toolchanger
Posted by
onecooltoolfool
on 2002-04-02 18:18:27 UTC
It will take some investigation and you will need much more I/O than
a standard parallel port.
The toolchanger probably runs off it's own PLC. You will have to
decode the sequence of events to the proper outputs. Also the
control goes into a type of feed hold during the toolchange with the
control waiting for a "ready" signal.
The spindle may have it's own control to for braking and angular
position.
Definately have to break the system down into each of it's stand
alone subsytems first.
Joe V.
a standard parallel port.
The toolchanger probably runs off it's own PLC. You will have to
decode the sequence of events to the proper outputs. Also the
control goes into a type of feed hold during the toolchange with the
control waiting for a "ready" signal.
The spindle may have it's own control to for braking and angular
position.
Definately have to break the system down into each of it's stand
alone subsytems first.
Joe V.
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "barker806" <barker1@m...> wrote:
> Have any of you played around with a tool changer in EMC?? I have
a
> machine that I got for a steal with a 30-position tool changer. I
> know this is a stretch but it is a hobby seems as I am an engineer
in
> a Woodmill (the pine you get at homedepot). The machine isn't in
dyer
> need of a retrofit but 3000 for software seems a bit out there. And
I
> like linux.
>
> Pleased to hear what you think
>
> Brian
Discussion Thread
Marcus & Eva
2000-12-12 19:44:03 UTC
Toolchanger
barker806
2002-04-02 16:25:32 UTC
Toolchanger
onecooltoolfool
2002-04-02 18:18:27 UTC
Re: Toolchanger
Jon Elson
2002-04-02 22:13:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Toolchanger
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2002-04-03 06:00:39 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Toolchanger
Sven Peter
2002-04-03 06:25:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Toolchanger
Jon Elson
2002-04-03 10:57:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Toolchanger
Ethan
2002-04-03 22:59:59 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Toolchanger
ballendo
2002-04-13 04:40:55 UTC
Re: Toolchanger