Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
Posted by
Brian Pitt
on 2002-04-12 20:10:11 UTC
yes tool wear has a great efect on the part tolerances ,BUT (here it comes..)
many machines can factor it in by measuring the spindle load
over time and swapping tools if the load runs some percentage over the
baseline setting for that tool
some can even measure vibrations and correct for chatter by tweaking the
feeds and speeds
others use a CMM type probe to measure the part and adjust the tool
offset to bring the part back into spec
and there are several types of broken tool detection systems
it just depends on how much setup time and money you want to spend :-)
Brian
many machines can factor it in by measuring the spindle load
over time and swapping tools if the load runs some percentage over the
baseline setting for that tool
some can even measure vibrations and correct for chatter by tweaking the
feeds and speeds
others use a CMM type probe to measure the part and adjust the tool
offset to bring the part back into spec
and there are several types of broken tool detection systems
it just depends on how much setup time and money you want to spend :-)
Brian
On Friday 12 April 2002 19:43, you wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed on this thread someone mentioned big high precision machining
> centres that have thermal management etc to keep them at real close
> tolerances at great precision. I remember seeing the working and result for
> how much a lump of steel extends for such and such a temperature rise and
> seeing how great it's effect was at these levels. But doesn't the wear on
> the machine's tooling contribute even more to inaccuracies? I mean the wear
> on a tool over tens of hours machining must be more than a few microns
> easily. Yay or nay? Please don't tell me the machine can factor in for tool
> wear? : )
>
> Thanks,
> John H.
Discussion Thread
John H.
2002-04-12 19:45:11 UTC
Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
Brian Pitt
2002-04-12 20:10:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
dave_ace_me
2002-04-12 20:12:33 UTC
Re: Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
Jon Elson
2002-04-12 23:05:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
John H.
2002-04-13 09:37:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
John H.
2002-04-13 09:49:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
Raymond Heckert
2002-04-13 20:29:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
John Heritage
2002-04-14 08:56:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
JanRwl@A...
2002-04-14 16:26:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
Sven Peter
2002-04-14 16:58:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
dave_ace_me
2002-04-14 19:52:11 UTC
Re: Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
ballendo
2002-04-15 07:52:35 UTC
Re: Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
John H.
2002-04-16 18:49:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
dave_ace_me
2002-04-17 02:04:00 UTC
Re: Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
batwings@i...
2002-04-17 05:24:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
batwings@i...
2002-04-17 07:54:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
ballendo
2002-04-19 06:01:29 UTC
re: tool change was Re: Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general