Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
Posted by
Raymond Heckert
on 2002-04-13 20:29:32 UTC
I don't think it'd be such a good idea to have all that swarf mixed in with
the coolant, and, just think of the logistics... a machine tool virtually
immersed in a small swimming pool. Just think of the possibility of getting
chips & dirt in the ballscrews!
Re: the water/coolant... Most (probably all) of the water-based cutting
fluids contain water-soluble oil(s), so iron-based parts don't usuallly
rust. In fact, if I let my parts 'air dry', when the water evaporates off,
a thin film of oil is left on the part, actually preventing rust from
forming.
RayHex
----------
the coolant, and, just think of the logistics... a machine tool virtually
immersed in a small swimming pool. Just think of the possibility of getting
chips & dirt in the ballscrews!
Re: the water/coolant... Most (probably all) of the water-based cutting
fluids contain water-soluble oil(s), so iron-based parts don't usuallly
rust. In fact, if I let my parts 'air dry', when the water evaporates off,
a thin film of oil is left on the part, actually preventing rust from
forming.
RayHex
----------
> From: John H. <johnhe-uk@...>heat
>
> Why aren't the machines put into some sort of water tight bath and just
> submerged in coolant while they're working? The rapids and high speed
> cutting wouldn't be as fast but the surrounding coolant would suck up
> much faster than air can. It could also be pumped through and kept at amuch
> more constant temperature than air (A high latent heat capacity I thinkbecause
> that's called).
>
> Does coolant, being a high percentage of water, not rust machinery
> the parts it contacts are usually stainless or chromed? The toolingbusiness
> with the machines if real cleaver, I like it very much so! : )
>
> John H.
Discussion Thread
John H.
2002-04-12 19:45:11 UTC
Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
Brian Pitt
2002-04-12 20:10:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
dave_ace_me
2002-04-12 20:12:33 UTC
Re: Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
Jon Elson
2002-04-12 23:05:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
John H.
2002-04-13 09:37:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
John H.
2002-04-13 09:49:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
Raymond Heckert
2002-04-13 20:29:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
John Heritage
2002-04-14 08:56:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
JanRwl@A...
2002-04-14 16:26:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
Sven Peter
2002-04-14 16:58:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
dave_ace_me
2002-04-14 19:52:11 UTC
Re: Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
ballendo
2002-04-15 07:52:35 UTC
Re: Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
John H.
2002-04-16 18:49:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
dave_ace_me
2002-04-17 02:04:00 UTC
Re: Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
batwings@i...
2002-04-17 05:24:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
batwings@i...
2002-04-17 07:54:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
ballendo
2002-04-19 06:01:29 UTC
re: tool change was Re: Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general