Re: Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
Posted by
dave_ace_me
on 2002-04-17 02:04:00 UTC
Hi John,
when cutting threads manually on a lathe. ok bad way of saying that,
but when you do cut them you get your thread to size, then take 2
more passes with the same tool depth.
that will just smooth the surface and take off any high spots.
I think that is close to polishing, really just taking out any tool
marks.
Dave
when cutting threads manually on a lathe. ok bad way of saying that,
but when you do cut them you get your thread to size, then take 2
more passes with the same tool depth.
that will just smooth the surface and take off any high spots.
I think that is close to polishing, really just taking out any tool
marks.
Dave
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "John H." <johnhe-uk@s...> wrote:
> > is called "adaptive" machining, which is a huge buzzword in the
> > metalworking industry lately... It means what it says, the machine
> > has the ability to adapt to variations measured, and make
corrections.
>
> ///Not long until the machine revolt now. It'll be like short
circuit all
> over again.
>
> > As someone else mentioned, this is now done with very precise
probes
> > and lasers,etc.. Someone else mentioned that before this "in
process
> > inspection/probing" (another buzz term), tool offsets were updated
> > every so many parts, or hours... This is an older process, and
can be
> > seen in even older G code, which has/uses G44-48 for increases to
the
> > tool offset(s).
>
> ///I read that the final stages are polishing, not milling, to get
it down
> to the last few 'cents. Does it mean polishing with a metal tool,
not the
> kind of polishing you think of when you do your car? When you
program a
> machine like a spanking new Haas that has a big tool changing on it
does the
> person doing the drawing have to tell the machines when to change
tools or
> can they work it out for themselves from details about the tool?
Also who
> makes these micron (Metric micron) level machines?
>
> Thanks,
> John H.
Discussion Thread
John H.
2002-04-12 19:45:11 UTC
Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
Brian Pitt
2002-04-12 20:10:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
dave_ace_me
2002-04-12 20:12:33 UTC
Re: Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
Jon Elson
2002-04-12 23:05:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
John H.
2002-04-13 09:37:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
John H.
2002-04-13 09:49:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
Raymond Heckert
2002-04-13 20:29:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
John Heritage
2002-04-14 08:56:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
JanRwl@A...
2002-04-14 16:26:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
Sven Peter
2002-04-14 16:58:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
dave_ace_me
2002-04-14 19:52:11 UTC
Re: Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
ballendo
2002-04-15 07:52:35 UTC
Re: Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
John H.
2002-04-16 18:49:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
dave_ace_me
2002-04-17 02:04:00 UTC
Re: Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
batwings@i...
2002-04-17 05:24:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
batwings@i...
2002-04-17 07:54:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general
ballendo
2002-04-19 06:01:29 UTC
re: tool change was Re: Was: Linear rail, accuracy in general