Re: oz*in NOT oz/in
Posted by
methadras
on 2002-04-16 18:16:08 UTC
why...? we all know that imperial is better... ;)
> > > (Yes I know oz & lb are not exactly units
> > > of force, we should be using Slugs but I'm
> > > afraid that will lead to even More Confusion!)
> > If I remember correctly, the slug is a unit of mass, not force.
> > Pounds and ounces _are_ units of force.
> > - Steve
>
> You should be using the internationally recognised SI N*m! :) Not
> imperial.
>
> John H.
> One man, one mission, metrication of the world.
Discussion Thread
Doug Fortune
2002-04-15 20:01:31 UTC
oz*in NOT oz/in
dave_ace_me
2002-04-15 20:45:43 UTC
Re: oz*in NOT oz/in
mariss92705
2002-04-15 21:35:29 UTC
Re: oz*in NOT oz/in
stvdnb
2002-04-15 21:39:56 UTC
Re: oz*in NOT oz/in
dave_ace_me
2002-04-16 14:31:11 UTC
Bring NASA in ( was Re: oz*in NOT oz/in
John H.
2002-04-16 17:47:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: oz*in NOT oz/in
methadras
2002-04-16 18:16:08 UTC
Re: oz*in NOT oz/in
Brian Pitt
2002-04-16 22:31:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: oz*in NOT oz/in
dkowalcz2000
2002-04-17 10:18:49 UTC
Bring NASA in ( was Re: oz*in NOT oz/in
dave_ace_me
2002-04-17 12:05:04 UTC
Re: oz*in NOT oz/in
batwings@i...
2002-04-17 18:53:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bring NASA in ( was Re: oz*in NOT oz/in
JanRwl@A...
2002-04-17 20:29:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bring NASA in ( was Re: oz*in NOT oz/in
Raymond Heckert
2002-04-18 10:37:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: oz*in NOT oz/in
methadras
2002-04-18 15:42:06 UTC
Re: oz*in NOT oz/in
Guy Sirois
2002-04-18 18:23:28 UTC
Units conversion program
Bill Vance
2002-04-18 21:36:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: oz*in NOT oz/in
Brian Pitt
2002-04-18 23:34:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: oz*in NOT oz/in
ballendo
2002-04-19 06:42:16 UTC
Bring NASA in ( was Re: oz*in NOT oz/in
John H.
2002-04-19 12:17:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: oz*in NOT oz/in
dhlocker
2002-04-19 23:28:32 UTC
Re: oz*in NOT oz/in