Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: oz*in NOT oz/in
Posted by
Brian Pitt
on 2002-04-16 22:31:00 UTC
one of the double secret provisions of the 1803 Louisiana Purchase Treaty
was that the U.S would never have to 'REALY' switch to metric ,just act like
we will... someday... maybe..
so Napoleon's revenge dosent apply in the states ;-)
Brian
was that the U.S would never have to 'REALY' switch to metric ,just act like
we will... someday... maybe..
so Napoleon's revenge dosent apply in the states ;-)
Brian
> You should be using the internationally recognised SI N*m! :) Not
> imperial.
>
> John H.
> One man, one mission, metrication of the world.
Discussion Thread
Doug Fortune
2002-04-15 20:01:31 UTC
oz*in NOT oz/in
dave_ace_me
2002-04-15 20:45:43 UTC
Re: oz*in NOT oz/in
mariss92705
2002-04-15 21:35:29 UTC
Re: oz*in NOT oz/in
stvdnb
2002-04-15 21:39:56 UTC
Re: oz*in NOT oz/in
dave_ace_me
2002-04-16 14:31:11 UTC
Bring NASA in ( was Re: oz*in NOT oz/in
John H.
2002-04-16 17:47:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: oz*in NOT oz/in
methadras
2002-04-16 18:16:08 UTC
Re: oz*in NOT oz/in
Brian Pitt
2002-04-16 22:31:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: oz*in NOT oz/in
dkowalcz2000
2002-04-17 10:18:49 UTC
Bring NASA in ( was Re: oz*in NOT oz/in
dave_ace_me
2002-04-17 12:05:04 UTC
Re: oz*in NOT oz/in
batwings@i...
2002-04-17 18:53:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bring NASA in ( was Re: oz*in NOT oz/in
JanRwl@A...
2002-04-17 20:29:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bring NASA in ( was Re: oz*in NOT oz/in
Raymond Heckert
2002-04-18 10:37:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: oz*in NOT oz/in
methadras
2002-04-18 15:42:06 UTC
Re: oz*in NOT oz/in
Guy Sirois
2002-04-18 18:23:28 UTC
Units conversion program
Bill Vance
2002-04-18 21:36:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: oz*in NOT oz/in
Brian Pitt
2002-04-18 23:34:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: oz*in NOT oz/in
ballendo
2002-04-19 06:42:16 UTC
Bring NASA in ( was Re: oz*in NOT oz/in
John H.
2002-04-19 12:17:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: oz*in NOT oz/in
dhlocker
2002-04-19 23:28:32 UTC
Re: oz*in NOT oz/in