Re: Re: Grizzly Mini Mill
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2000-01-13 14:12:28 UTC
Ron Ginger wrote:
would do fine. The couple is not likely to bind the head slide, as it is ALREADY
being driven by a couple from the rack. This is pretty similar to the way
I did it on my Bridgeport. I put the screw absolutely as close to the quill
as I could, to reduce the moment arm. Hmmm, 12" of 'quill' travel - sounds
real nice!
Jon
> From: Ron Ginger <ginger@...>Done properly, with plenty of support for the ends of the screw, it probably
>
> Jon Elson asked why I didnt think the Z would be easy to add a leadscrew.
> The problem is the head rides on a cast box section with the V on one face.
> The rack runs up the length of the V, but is mounted on the surface- there
> is no slot. If you tried to slot it to put a lead screw inside the box I
> think it would weaken it to much- the total travel is about 12". I suppose
> you could add a screw off to the side, but then it would have a couple and
> might tend to bind.
would do fine. The couple is not likely to bind the head slide, as it is ALREADY
being driven by a couple from the rack. This is pretty similar to the way
I did it on my Bridgeport. I put the screw absolutely as close to the quill
as I could, to reduce the moment arm. Hmmm, 12" of 'quill' travel - sounds
real nice!
Jon
Discussion Thread
Ron Ginger
1999-12-24 05:13:39 UTC
Grizzly Mini Mill
MIADsgns@x...
1999-12-25 12:52:37 UTC
Re: Grizzly Mini Mill
Ron Ginger
2000-01-13 09:25:36 UTC
Re: Grizzly Mini Mill
Jon Anderson
2000-01-13 09:42:27 UTC
Re: Re: Grizzly Mini Mill
Marshall Pharoah
2000-01-13 09:51:45 UTC
Re: Re: Grizzly Mini Mill
Jon Elson
2000-01-13 14:12:28 UTC
Re: Re: Grizzly Mini Mill
Charles Gallo
2000-01-13 17:28:55 UTC
Re: Re: Grizzly Mini Mill