Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] what's better?
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2002-10-10 23:32:23 UTC
afogassa wrote:
the
available torque, and top speed at some voltage. If the motor has lots
of speed to spare, then you can use a belt reduction. If the top speed in
direct drive is close to the speed you want to achieve, then you CAN'T
use a reduction.
As for couplings, the belt is a pretty cheap way to connect the two.
Otherwise,
you need very good coaxial alignment of the motor and screw, and then a
helically-slotted coupler carved out of a single piece of aluminum. These
are a bit expensive. But, they don't produce backlash, as most other types
of couplings do.
Jon
> Hi, allIt depends on the ratings of the motor. First, see if you can determine
>
> I'm getting ready to install a servo drive+ motor to my gantry,
> And I'm wondering if I should conect the servo to the shaft using a
> direct coupling or use a timing belt in a 2 to 1 ratio.
> Torque should be no problem in either configuration.
> What would be better?
>
>
the
available torque, and top speed at some voltage. If the motor has lots
of speed to spare, then you can use a belt reduction. If the top speed in
direct drive is close to the speed you want to achieve, then you CAN'T
use a reduction.
As for couplings, the belt is a pretty cheap way to connect the two.
Otherwise,
you need very good coaxial alignment of the motor and screw, and then a
helically-slotted coupler carved out of a single piece of aluminum. These
are a bit expensive. But, they don't produce backlash, as most other types
of couplings do.
Jon
Discussion Thread
afogassa
2002-10-09 20:40:16 UTC
what's better?
Jon Elson
2002-10-10 23:32:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] what's better?
dakota8833
2002-10-11 10:57:55 UTC
Re: what's better?
afogassa
2002-10-11 16:43:33 UTC
Re: what's better?
dakota8833
2002-10-12 07:43:51 UTC
Re: what's better?