Re: RS-274D
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2000-02-03 12:15:27 UTC
"Harrison, Doug" wrote:
don't want to get sued,
or have my web privledges cut off.
I also wouldn't bother, the RS-274D standard is quite useless. It is a
formal specification
of the language, almost totally devoid of any reference to what the
language elements MEAN!
You would know absolutely not one iota more about writing G-code after
reading this!
Jon
>I would have already done that, but the document is copyrighted. I
> I work for a public institution and I could definitely use these
>
> documents. Somebody tell me where and how to acquire them. I'll have
> the
> library order a copy and then put them on a web page or something.
don't want to get sued,
or have my web privledges cut off.
I also wouldn't bother, the RS-274D standard is quite useless. It is a
formal specification
of the language, almost totally devoid of any reference to what the
language elements MEAN!
You would know absolutely not one iota more about writing G-code after
reading this!
Jon
Discussion Thread
Jon Elson
2000-02-03 12:15:27 UTC
Re: RS-274D
Harrison, Doug
2000-02-03 12:43:42 UTC
RE: Re: RS-274D
Jon Elson
2000-02-03 14:39:34 UTC
Re: Re: RS-274D