Re: DRO encoders- Rotary or Linear?
    Posted by
    
      jcc3inc
    
  
  
    on 2002-10-29 06:44:30 UTC
  
  --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "Roger Linscheid" <r.linscheid@a...> 
wrote:
Since you seem interested in accuracy, why not use rack and pinion
for rotary encoder drive. A 1/10 inch circular pitch rack with a 20
tooth pinion requires a 500 count encoder to read .001". Precision
rack is available from PIC Instruments, Berg, and Allied Devices.
They can also provide you the pinions. Less expensive rack is
available elsewhere.
Linear encoders eliminate backlash and encoder mounting errors and
are probably the better of the two approaches. A 250 line scale will
give you (with 4x multiplication) a .001" resolution. A 360 line
scale yields 1440 steps per inch or .6944 mils per step.
Good luck,
Jack C.
wrote:
> Hi, I am ready to begin adding a DRO to my G4003 lathe. What isthe
> current thought on the best method to accomplish my goal?Roger:
>
> IIRC, when I was looking into this before, the linear strips from
> U.S. Digital were only available in 250 CPI and this was not
> considered high enough to provide the necessary resolution. Using
> rotary encoders meant the possibility of losing counts if the drive
> cable slipped or stretched.
>
> Now U.S. Digital has linear strips in 300 and 360 CPI. Will these
> provide a resolution of 0.0005 or better?
>
Since you seem interested in accuracy, why not use rack and pinion
for rotary encoder drive. A 1/10 inch circular pitch rack with a 20
tooth pinion requires a 500 count encoder to read .001". Precision
rack is available from PIC Instruments, Berg, and Allied Devices.
They can also provide you the pinions. Less expensive rack is
available elsewhere.
Linear encoders eliminate backlash and encoder mounting errors and
are probably the better of the two approaches. A 250 line scale will
give you (with 4x multiplication) a .001" resolution. A 360 line
scale yields 1440 steps per inch or .6944 mils per step.
Good luck,
Jack C.
Discussion Thread
  
    Roger Linscheid
  
2002-10-28 18:49:39 UTC
  DRO encoders- Rotary or Linear?
  
    jcc3inc
  
2002-10-29 06:44:30 UTC
  Re: DRO encoders- Rotary or Linear?
  
    alex
  
2002-10-29 07:47:00 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO encoders- Rotary or Linear?
  
    John A. McFadden
  
2002-10-29 12:58:04 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO encoders- Rotary or Linear?
  
    Matt Shaver
  
2002-10-29 21:15:03 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO encoders- Rotary or Linear?
  
    Raymond Heckert
  
2002-10-29 21:29:55 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO encoders- Rotary or Linear?
  
    Raymond Heckert
  
2002-10-29 21:29:55 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO encoders- Rotary or Linear?
  
    Jon Elson
  
2002-10-29 23:08:12 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO encoders- Rotary or Linear?
  
    Jon Elson
  
2002-10-29 23:30:01 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO encoders- Rotary or Linear?
  
    John A. McFadden
  
2002-10-30 04:22:39 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO encoders- Rotary or Linear?
  
    bjammin@i...
  
2002-10-30 04:35:49 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO encoders- Rotary or Linear?
  
    gittt2000
  
2002-10-30 05:42:30 UTC
  Re: DRO encoders- Rotary or Linear?
  
    alex
  
2002-10-30 06:48:27 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO encoders- Rotary or Linear?
  
    alex
  
2002-10-30 06:49:18 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO encoders- Rotary or Linear?
  
    Tim Goldstein
  
2002-10-30 10:25:08 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO encoders- Rotary or Linear?
  
    Jon Elson
  
2002-10-30 10:34:19 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO encoders- Rotary or Linear?