Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO encoders- Rotary or Linear?
Posted by
Raymond Heckert
on 2002-10-29 21:29:55 UTC
Alex, It's not merely a backlash issue. (Although, a
properly designed roller chain transmission *must* have
some slack built in. As any kind of roller chain meets the
sprocket, and changes from linear to rotary motion, the
chain jumps up, and down at each pitch. This is more
pronounced with low tooth numbers, and double pitch chain.
Immediately, upon full engagement with the tooth, the
linear section of the chain begins to swing downward, as
the disappearing tooth 's rotary motion moves it downward.
When the next tooth engages, the chain is brought up to
tangency with the pitch circle again. This is only minute
movement, but it sets up a quite a vibration. Timing chain
is about the only chain that doesn't exhibit this quirk,
which is why they're called timing chains, because that's
what they're used for. Virtually vibration free, and they
take up their own slack by climbing to the highest
available form on the tooth.
RayHex
----------
properly designed roller chain transmission *must* have
some slack built in. As any kind of roller chain meets the
sprocket, and changes from linear to rotary motion, the
chain jumps up, and down at each pitch. This is more
pronounced with low tooth numbers, and double pitch chain.
Immediately, upon full engagement with the tooth, the
linear section of the chain begins to swing downward, as
the disappearing tooth 's rotary motion moves it downward.
When the next tooth engages, the chain is brought up to
tangency with the pitch circle again. This is only minute
movement, but it sets up a quite a vibration. Timing chain
is about the only chain that doesn't exhibit this quirk,
which is why they're called timing chains, because that's
what they're used for. Virtually vibration free, and they
take up their own slack by climbing to the highest
available form on the tooth.
RayHex
----------
> From: alex <telecomt@...>normal bicycle
>
> This may be a stupid question, but why not to use a
> chain\sprocket combination for driving an encoder?
> Is it a backlash issue?
Discussion Thread
Roger Linscheid
2002-10-28 18:49:39 UTC
DRO encoders- Rotary or Linear?
jcc3inc
2002-10-29 06:44:30 UTC
Re: DRO encoders- Rotary or Linear?
alex
2002-10-29 07:47:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO encoders- Rotary or Linear?
John A. McFadden
2002-10-29 12:58:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO encoders- Rotary or Linear?
Matt Shaver
2002-10-29 21:15:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO encoders- Rotary or Linear?
Raymond Heckert
2002-10-29 21:29:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO encoders- Rotary or Linear?
Raymond Heckert
2002-10-29 21:29:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO encoders- Rotary or Linear?
Jon Elson
2002-10-29 23:08:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO encoders- Rotary or Linear?
Jon Elson
2002-10-29 23:30:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO encoders- Rotary or Linear?
John A. McFadden
2002-10-30 04:22:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO encoders- Rotary or Linear?
bjammin@i...
2002-10-30 04:35:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO encoders- Rotary or Linear?
gittt2000
2002-10-30 05:42:30 UTC
Re: DRO encoders- Rotary or Linear?
alex
2002-10-30 06:48:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO encoders- Rotary or Linear?
alex
2002-10-30 06:49:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO encoders- Rotary or Linear?
Tim Goldstein
2002-10-30 10:25:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO encoders- Rotary or Linear?
Jon Elson
2002-10-30 10:34:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO encoders- Rotary or Linear?