Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] VFD's
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2002-11-07 23:02:09 UTC
Tim Goldstein wrote:
are tuned for the motor
inductance, and a 7.5 Hp motor has a vastly lower inductance than a 1.5
Hp. This can cause problems
with the PWM schemes they use to approximate the sine wave. Also, the
current limits may not go
low enough to protect a 1.5 Hp motor.
Jon
>Check the specs. Many of the VFDs require you to derate them by 50% when runRunning a 1.5 Hp motor on a 7.5 Hp drive may cause problems. The VFDs
>on single phase so that for a 3 hp application you would need a 6 hp or more
>VFD. I have never seen a 6 hp so you would go to a 7.5 hp.
>
>
are tuned for the motor
inductance, and a 7.5 Hp motor has a vastly lower inductance than a 1.5
Hp. This can cause problems
with the PWM schemes they use to approximate the sine wave. Also, the
current limits may not go
low enough to protect a 1.5 Hp motor.
Jon
Discussion Thread
johnhe
2001-10-04 10:44:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: VFD's
valrox1
2002-01-30 12:08:30 UTC
VFD's
Tim Goldstein
2002-11-07 16:37:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] VFD's
Mike Gann
2002-11-07 19:10:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] VFD's
Jon Elson
2002-11-07 23:02:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] VFD's
turbulatordude
2002-11-08 04:36:03 UTC
Re: VFD's
doug98105
2002-11-08 06:12:40 UTC
Re: VFD's
jmkasunich
2002-11-08 06:40:09 UTC
Re: VFD's
bjammin@i...
2002-11-08 09:34:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: VFD's
Mike Gann
2002-11-08 19:14:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] VFD's
Jon Elson
2002-11-08 22:33:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: VFD's
Jon Elson
2002-11-08 22:39:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: VFD's
Jon Elson
2002-11-08 23:18:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] VFD's
turbulatordude
2002-11-10 14:15:48 UTC
Re: VFD's
Jon Elson
2002-11-10 22:26:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: VFD's
turbulatordude
2002-11-11 04:36:13 UTC
Re: VFD's
jmkasunich
2002-11-11 08:05:27 UTC
Re: VFD's
Jon Elson
2002-11-11 11:23:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: VFD's
jmkasunich
2002-11-11 13:21:15 UTC
Re: VFD's