Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: VFD's
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2002-11-10 22:26:32 UTC
turbulatordude wrote:
But, for motors in the
1-3 Hp range, the magnetizing current seems to stay pretty high, even at
no load. Or, maybe
this is only on machine tool and compressor motors, which may have a
greater service
factor designed into them. My Bridgeport 1J with 'pancake' motor draws
3.0 amps no
load and 3.3 A at full load, according to my VFD's internal readout. It
smoked my
1/2 Hp VFD, although that was a pretty inferior unit.
Jon
>I might agree with not using lower rated motors if it was not used inYes, on the larger motors, this seems to work, especially in a pinch.
>common practice so often.
>
>When I used to sell VFD's the 10 and 20 hp units were shipped in a
>week or two, whereas the 100 hp units took many weeks, sometimes 8
>weeks or more.
>
>We would install a unit that was capable of getting the motor up
>between 20% and 50% of speed, ideally 80%. these were for
>centrifigual loads, fan motors to be exact. The VFD would run for
>weeks or months 24/7 until the unit could be switched out with the
>full rated unit. 10hp on a 100hp motor was not uncommon.
>
>
But, for motors in the
1-3 Hp range, the magnetizing current seems to stay pretty high, even at
no load. Or, maybe
this is only on machine tool and compressor motors, which may have a
greater service
factor designed into them. My Bridgeport 1J with 'pancake' motor draws
3.0 amps no
load and 3.3 A at full load, according to my VFD's internal readout. It
smoked my
1/2 Hp VFD, although that was a pretty inferior unit.
Jon
Discussion Thread
johnhe
2001-10-04 10:44:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: VFD's
valrox1
2002-01-30 12:08:30 UTC
VFD's
Tim Goldstein
2002-11-07 16:37:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] VFD's
Mike Gann
2002-11-07 19:10:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] VFD's
Jon Elson
2002-11-07 23:02:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] VFD's
turbulatordude
2002-11-08 04:36:03 UTC
Re: VFD's
doug98105
2002-11-08 06:12:40 UTC
Re: VFD's
jmkasunich
2002-11-08 06:40:09 UTC
Re: VFD's
bjammin@i...
2002-11-08 09:34:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: VFD's
Mike Gann
2002-11-08 19:14:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] VFD's
Jon Elson
2002-11-08 22:33:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: VFD's
Jon Elson
2002-11-08 22:39:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: VFD's
Jon Elson
2002-11-08 23:18:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] VFD's
turbulatordude
2002-11-10 14:15:48 UTC
Re: VFD's
Jon Elson
2002-11-10 22:26:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: VFD's
turbulatordude
2002-11-11 04:36:13 UTC
Re: VFD's
jmkasunich
2002-11-11 08:05:27 UTC
Re: VFD's
Jon Elson
2002-11-11 11:23:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: VFD's
jmkasunich
2002-11-11 13:21:15 UTC
Re: VFD's