Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Machine Options in CAM Software ?

natchamp_87 wrote:

>
> Thanks Jerry, it did help clarify a few things although I can't say I
> completely understand it all.

Mark, please don't take what I say to be anywhere near
reasonable. I'd like to say I know something, but I'm afraid I'm
asking someone to confirm my beliefs as much as telling you what
I believe.

> The part I'm having problems with
> is understanding the link between the CAM software which generates
> the G code and toolpath info and the Gecko drives.

That is what I think a *post processor* is supposed to do. Or
what people here have told me a post processor actually does. I
think a post processor becomes necessary when manufacturers stick
a ROM chip or something in their circuitry to obfuscate a direct
connection between the G-code and the motor drivers. I admit
that some translator might be needed, but why this isn't standard
based on the IEE standard is a mystery if it isn't just done for
profit. It is my understanding that EMC can take G-code and
output it to the drivers. This should eliminate any need for a
translation device. This idea is one that I am hoping someone on
the list will address and explore a bit.

> I'm assuming now
> that the CAM software like VisualMill doesn't interface with the
> Gecko's. The G code file generated by the CAM is read by a NC
> program like Turbocnc and then sent to the Gecko's ?

Could be, I have no idea. But it seems a little complicated to
me and unnecessary or overly complex.

Cheers,

JerryK