RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question on EMC
Posted by
j.guenther
on 2002-12-12 09:50:19 UTC
Art,
I personally have not seen EMC handle a rotary axis correctly when
configured as an angular axis. For me that means 1 degree is 80 steps which
EMC does not seem to be able to handle. Now if I configure it as a linear
axis where 1 unit = 360 degrees then it works much better, but then I don't
really want to tell it G01 a0.1111 to move the axis 40 degrees. I have
tried it on BDI-TNG, BDI 2.16 and one or two more BDI releases that
currently escape me. I will be downloading BDI 2.18 and the new BDI-TNG
this week to try. It is not a issue of being able to understand the
commands, it is an issue of EMC actually issuing the proper number of steps
at some commanded feed rate. Does Mach1 handle the angular axis correctly?
John Guenther
'Ye Olde Pen Maker'
Sterling, Virginia
I personally have not seen EMC handle a rotary axis correctly when
configured as an angular axis. For me that means 1 degree is 80 steps which
EMC does not seem to be able to handle. Now if I configure it as a linear
axis where 1 unit = 360 degrees then it works much better, but then I don't
really want to tell it G01 a0.1111 to move the axis 40 degrees. I have
tried it on BDI-TNG, BDI 2.16 and one or two more BDI releases that
currently escape me. I will be downloading BDI 2.18 and the new BDI-TNG
this week to try. It is not a issue of being able to understand the
commands, it is an issue of EMC actually issuing the proper number of steps
at some commanded feed rate. Does Mach1 handle the angular axis correctly?
John Guenther
'Ye Olde Pen Maker'
Sterling, Virginia
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Art [mailto:fenerty@...]
> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 12:00 PM
> To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question on EMC
>
>
> Hi All:
> One of my Mach1 users has asked what posts for various programs can use
> the rotary axis, due to the fact that they do not rollover to 0 at 360
> degrees. The Posts he's using can't seem to handle the math.
> Mach1 uses the
> EMC interpreter so I thought I'd ask the experts.
>
> Is the fact that EMC's rotary axis work in a linear fashion a problem?
> Does anyone else have this problem in rotary work. The general concensus
> among users seems to be that they don't want the rotaries to rollover at
> 360, but I can see this users point. The distance from 350 degrees to 20
> degrees really SHOULD be a command like A+30.0 instead of A380, but if the
> posts support A380 there should be no problem. Do the current
> posts you use
> support the rotary axis in a linear fashion or is EMC
> configurable( if so I
> haven't seen the code) to 360 rollover with + and - G-Code commands for
> direction?
>
> Thanks,
> Art
> www.artofcnc.ca
>
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
> URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
> aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to
> reach it if you have trouble.
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this
> to be a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same
> members are there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>
> NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY
> POSTING THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO
> EXCEPTIONS........
> bill
> List Mom
> List Owner
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Discussion Thread
Art
2002-12-12 09:02:52 UTC
Question on EMC
Tim Goldstein
2002-12-12 09:32:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question on EMC
j.guenther
2002-12-12 09:50:19 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question on EMC
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-12-12 12:03:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question on EMC
Jon Elson
2002-12-12 23:18:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question on EMC
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-12-13 11:45:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question on EMC
Ray Henry
2002-12-13 20:55:04 UTC
Re: Re: Question on EMC