Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question on EMC
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2002-12-12 23:18:52 UTC
Alan Marconett KM6VV wrote:
(less confusing) and "rollover",
the other is when to rollover. For rotary, that would be 360 degrees.
Jon
>Hi Art,Good thinking. You need 2 parameters, though. One is "continuous"
>
>My 0.02 USD, as I can't speak from authority on how it "should" work.
>What about adding a parameter to allow the user to select "linear" (?)
>or "rollover" mode? That's what I was thinking of doing. I only use my
>rotary table in the "linear" fashion. I do recall an RDF (radio
>direction finding) project (CY545 controller) I did in which the stepper
>and gearbox DID want to operate in a "rollover" fashion. Although that
>project was a "canned" project, our controller programs would be able to
>handle that motion control task; if the parameter was added.
>
>
(less confusing) and "rollover",
the other is when to rollover. For rotary, that would be 360 degrees.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Art
2002-12-12 09:02:52 UTC
Question on EMC
Tim Goldstein
2002-12-12 09:32:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question on EMC
j.guenther
2002-12-12 09:50:19 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question on EMC
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-12-12 12:03:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question on EMC
Jon Elson
2002-12-12 23:18:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question on EMC
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-12-13 11:45:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question on EMC
Ray Henry
2002-12-13 20:55:04 UTC
Re: Re: Question on EMC