CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Batteries in Power Supply

Posted by j.guenther
on 2003-01-21 12:27:53 UTC
So would this mean that you could eliminate the filter capacitor from the
power supply leaving only the transformer and rectifier?

John Guenther
'Ye Olde Pen Maker'
Sterling, Virginia

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mariss Freimanis <mariss92705@...>
> [mailto:mariss92705@...]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 14:14 PM
> To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Batteries in Power Supply
>
>
> Bernard,
>
> I posted on this topic about a year or so ago. The main advantage
> mentioned was servomotors usually have a large ratio between their
> stall current and continuous rated current (5:1 or more).
>
> This means the power supply has to be 5 or more times bigger than
> needed just to supply very short duty cycle accel/decel current
> pulses to the motor.
>
> The idea was to use low AH batteries to supply this current; they
> would recharge between accel/decel cycles. The battery would connect
> to the power supply "+" terminal via a rectifier and it's voltage
> would be a little less than the power supply's voltage. Under load,
> the supply voltage would sag, forward biasing the rctifier from the
> battery, which would now supply the pulse current.
>
> A motor stall current 5 times the max rated current implies a 4% duty
> cycle. Theoretically a 1AH battery could supply 20A for 3 minutes,
> way longer than you would need for accel/decel (1 or 2 seconds).
>
> Now the supply could be sized for the continous current only plus
> what would be needed to restore the battery charge (5 * 4% = 20% or
> 1.2 times the max rated motor current).
>
> Mariss
>
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Bernard R
> <bwjarandall@c...>" <bwjarandall@c...> wrote:
> > In view of the recent interest in power supplies has anyone thought
> > about using batteries in place of capacitors in some of the larger
> > power supplies?
> >
> > If you used 5 12Volt batteries and 1 6Volt that would give a
> nominal
> > 66 volt, with a fully charged cell rising to 2.4 volt that would
> give
> > an additional 13.2Volt (33 cells @ .2V) for a total of 79.2 volt.
> >
> > In a recent post Les Watts reports routinely seeing 60 amp peaks on
> > rapid starts, stops and sharp curves, I would think batteries could
> > cope with these conditions better than conventional caps.
> >
> > I'm not sure if there would be any significant price difference
> > between caps and batteries, a 100Volt 15,000uF cap is almost $30
> and
> > for a reasonably stiff supply you probably need at least 3 in
> > parallel. Without doing the math, I suspect you need more than 3
> caps
> > to cope with 60 Amp peaks. 12V 4.5 A/Hour batteries are about $17
> and
> > 6V 4.2 A/H $9 for a total of $94. (12V 12 AH cost $$35)
> >
> > I'm not sure how effectively batteries kill spikes, I would have
> > thought much better than caps, they should absorb overvoltage from
> > motors quite effectively.
> >
> > I can see difficulties in disconnecting the batteries from the
> drives
> > at power off, but this should be offset by being able to use
> smaller
> > transformers.
> >
> > Just a thought.
> >
> > Bernard
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com,
> wanliker@..., timg@...
> Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... [Moderators]
> URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
> aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to
> reach it if you have trouble.
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this
> to be a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same
> members are there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>
> NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY
> POSTING THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO
> EXCEPTIONS........
> bill
> List Mom
> List Owner
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>

Discussion Thread

Bernard R <bwjarandall@c... 2003-01-21 10:34:58 UTC Batteries in Power Supply Mariss Freimanis <mariss92705@y... 2003-01-21 11:13:46 UTC Re: Batteries in Power Supply Bernard R <bwjarandall@c... 2003-01-21 11:35:58 UTC Re: Batteries in Power Supply Kevin P. Martin 2003-01-21 11:58:09 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Batteries in Power Supply Bernard R <bwjarandall@c... 2003-01-21 12:17:20 UTC Re: Batteries in Power Supply j.guenther 2003-01-21 12:27:53 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Batteries in Power Supply Kevin P. Martin 2003-01-21 12:48:07 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Batteries in Power Supply Carl Mikkelsen, Oasis 2003-01-21 13:30:57 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Batteries in Power Supply Mariss Freimanis <mariss92705@y... 2003-01-21 13:36:44 UTC Re: Batteries in Power Supply Alan Marconett KM6VV 2003-01-21 13:41:18 UTC Re: Batteries in Power Supply sparkness2001 <mark@c... 2003-01-21 13:41:32 UTC Re: Batteries in Power Supply Bill Higdon 2003-01-21 14:54:56 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Batteries in Power Supply turbulatordude <davemucha@j... 2003-01-21 16:00:43 UTC Re: Batteries in Power Supply 0good in theory