Re: Don't give up!!!
Posted by
ballendo <ballendo@y...
on 2003-01-31 08:01:01 UTC
Thanks Tim,
I will add that a tolerance easily better than .020 can be met by a
VERY cheap machine...
Machine wise, Resolution is easiest to get, and repeatability is not
far behind. Inherent accuracy will be nearly impossible at these low
prices, but the availablility of those first two above make it
achievable by correcting the repeatable error to the limit of the
resolution.
Mostly, cheap machines give up rigidity, speed and power.
I don't want someone thinking they have to live with .020 because
thy're poor!
Hope this helps,
Ballendo
P.S. another truth is that far more often than not, when we're
building something for ourselves, relative accuracy is much more
important than dimensional accuracy. as long as the parts fit
TOGETHER well, their being too big or too small often dpoes not
matter. even Joe Martin, of Sherline (who has a bit of experience
holding tolerances (decades of parts which mate each other!)
talksabout this in his instructions on threading. Cutting something
to fit something else which we have in hand is not the same as
meeting some dimensional standard so that parts from many machines,
vendors, and places can mate well.
One useful trick for a cheap (inaccurate, but repeatable) machine is
to use the same part of the travel(s) for mating parts. In other
words, if you're cutting an inlay near the origin of x and y, be sure
to cut the pocket in the same place. Will fit like a glove, even if
the machine IS out .020... (which it won't be, IMO)
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Tim Goldstein" <timg@k...>
wrote:
I will add that a tolerance easily better than .020 can be met by a
VERY cheap machine...
Machine wise, Resolution is easiest to get, and repeatability is not
far behind. Inherent accuracy will be nearly impossible at these low
prices, but the availablility of those first two above make it
achievable by correcting the repeatable error to the limit of the
resolution.
Mostly, cheap machines give up rigidity, speed and power.
I don't want someone thinking they have to live with .020 because
thy're poor!
Hope this helps,
Ballendo
P.S. another truth is that far more often than not, when we're
building something for ourselves, relative accuracy is much more
important than dimensional accuracy. as long as the parts fit
TOGETHER well, their being too big or too small often dpoes not
matter. even Joe Martin, of Sherline (who has a bit of experience
holding tolerances (decades of parts which mate each other!)
talksabout this in his instructions on threading. Cutting something
to fit something else which we have in hand is not the same as
meeting some dimensional standard so that parts from many machines,
vendors, and places can mate well.
One useful trick for a cheap (inaccurate, but repeatable) machine is
to use the same part of the travel(s) for mating parts. In other
words, if you're cutting an inlay near the origin of x and y, be sure
to cut the pocket in the same place. Will fit like a glove, even if
the machine IS out .020... (which it won't be, IMO)
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Tim Goldstein" <timg@k...>
wrote:
> Ballendo,is an
>
> Thanks for the post. This is a subject I keep harping on. Yes CNC
> expensive hobby, but we (the royal collective we) often tech it todeath
> and make it far more difficult and expensive than it has to be. Ithink
> it is very important to step back and look at the desired outcome.If
> the goal is to make a machine that can cut balsa and hold atolerance of
> say .020" than there are some very low cost approaches to gettingthe
> job done. As you mention there are low cost designs that do workand you
> can cut balsa just fine with a small high speed bit. Not everythingdo
> needs to be designed to hold micron accuracy.
>
> Tim
> [Denver, CO]
> Sherline products at Deep Discount
> Mach1 & DeskCNC with credit card ordering
> www.KTMarketing.com/Sherline
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > Hello,
> >
> > Depends on what you're looking to do. And what you're WILLING to
> > to get there...get a
> >
> > So maybe you can't get a laser CNC setup for 300 bucks? You CAN
> > balsa CAPABLE setup for 300 bucks (Dave rigotti, and JohnKleinbauer
> > come to mind, as well as Luberth, and others).to
> >
> > So build one of these. Maybe you can sell some model balsa "kits"
> > others to finance the 500 more bucks you'll need to put a laseron
> > Johns "Scrappy", or pipe dream, or daves Hobby CNC... Yeah, ifyou're
> > willing to look, and learn, these prices ARE do-able. been there.diode?
> > Done that.
> >
> > It's pretty easy to get caught up in the "professional" side of
> > looking at cnc, and forget that the hobby side doesn't HAVE to
> > cost "thousands"...
> >
> > Good luck,
> >
> > Ballendo
> >
> > P.S. Did anyone contact mr. linear to find out where he got his
> >
Discussion Thread
Fusion X Studio
2003-01-29 11:19:30 UTC
Small CNC Laser for Balsa
gnrshelton <gnrshelton@y...
2003-01-29 12:08:06 UTC
Re: Small CNC Laser for Balsa
John Myjak <myjakjs@a...
2003-01-29 13:14:57 UTC
Re: Small CNC Laser for Balsa
Fusion X Studio
2003-01-29 16:00:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Small CNC Laser for Balsa
Peter Seddon
2003-01-30 02:01:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Small CNC Laser for Balsa
ballendo <ballendo@y...
2003-01-31 06:51:01 UTC
Re: Small CNC Laser for Balsa
C.S. Mo
2003-01-31 06:59:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Small CNC Laser for Balsa
ballendo <ballendo@y...
2003-01-31 07:11:58 UTC
Don't give up!!! wasRe: Small CNC Laser for Balsa
Tim Goldstein
2003-01-31 07:46:00 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Don't give up!!!
ballendo <ballendo@y...
2003-01-31 08:01:01 UTC
Re: Don't give up!!!
j.guenther
2003-01-31 08:24:14 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Don't give up!!!
C.S. Mo
2003-01-31 08:30:51 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Don't give up!!!
ballendo <ballendo@y...
2003-01-31 08:45:43 UTC
xylotec xfrmr was Re: Don't give up!!!
ballendo <ballendo@y...
2003-01-31 08:50:15 UTC
Re: Don't give up!!!
Jon Elson
2003-01-31 10:27:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Small CNC Laser for Balsa
jeffalanp <xylotex@h...
2003-01-31 10:32:30 UTC
Re: Don't give up!!!
j.guenther
2003-01-31 10:53:33 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Don't give up!!!
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2003-01-31 13:29:29 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Don't give up!!!