CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Visual Mill vs. MACH1

on 2003-03-04 19:35:32 UTC
Jeff,

First of all, what type of parts are you going to machine? I like to
separate the parts into two groups. The first being the mechanical part that
you would make when building a machine. The second group would be the
artistic parts which could include a large group of designs.

AutoDesk Inventor would be fine if you are making parts for a machine.

Rhino3D would be my choice if you are starting out and want to go through
the learning process. Rhino will let you create almost anything.

You would still need a program like VisualMill (cam only) to create your
tool paths. After that you would need Mach1 to (read your G code) control
your mill..

Bob Campbell
----- Original Message -----
From: "washcomp" <jeff@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 7:15 PM
Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Visual Mill vs. MACH1


> I'm a little confused by the type of software that I should be
> looking at for the Bridgeport I'm converting. Based on some of the
> discussions on the group, I downloaded the demo versions of Visual
> Mill and MACH1. They seem to be a couple of orders of magnitude
> different in complexity and capability. Both seem to have
> capabilities the other doesn't. I'd like to work in Windows. I also
> have access to AutoDesk Mechanical Desktop amnd AutoDesk Inventor.
> Would these packages be of use? (No point in learning them if they
> are not as good as some other solution).
>
> Thanks for all your help.
>
> Regards,
> Jeff
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...,
timg@...
> Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... [Moderators]
> URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if
you have trouble.
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a
sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT
subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>
> NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM.
DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> bill
> List Mom
> List Owner
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>

Discussion Thread

washcomp 2003-03-04 19:16:01 UTC Visual Mill vs. MACH1 Robert Campbell 2003-03-04 19:35:32 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Visual Mill vs. MACH1 ballendo 2003-03-05 06:28:52 UTC CAD CAM 101 was Re: Visual Mill vs. MACH1 Tony Jeffree 2003-03-05 06:52:36 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CAD CAM 101 was Re: Visual Mill vs. MACH1 Robert Campbell 2003-03-05 07:09:59 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Visual Mill vs. MACH1 Jeff Goldberg 2003-03-05 08:13:49 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Visual Mill vs. MACH1 Fred Smith 2003-03-05 08:47:17 UTC Re: Visual Mill vs. MACH1 Tim Goldstein 2003-03-05 11:01:19 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Visual Mill vs. MACH1