CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: Visual Mill vs. MACH1

Posted by Fred Smith
on 2003-03-05 08:47:17 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Jeff Goldberg" <jeff@w...>
wrote:
> Great question! Short answer - I don't know. Is Visual Mill 3.0
(Free
> version) sufficient for the CAM function on a 3 axis Bridgeport?
I'd like
> to keep the software cost as low as possible until I get familiar
with what
> this beast will do.
>

Jeff,

Look at DeskCNC as well as Mach1. DeskCNC has many CAM functions as
well as the controller capabilities.

On the CAM Side, it will import 2D DXF for pocketing and contouring
or 3D STL for swoopy surfacesfrom your CAD design program, as well
as process images(from files or scan direct) to make 2D tracings for
engraving and 3D height field carvings. It also includes Tru-type
font engraving.

http://www.imsrv.com/deskcnc

The controller is based on EMC syntax and has an editor and
simulator built in. There is also support for contact probe scanning.

One good feature is that it does not require a high powered computer
to run. It accomplishes machine control via a serial port interface
with the realtime processes on an inexpensive external board ($50,
and yes I have about 6 left that are free). Most any computer that
will run Windows 95 or later will run DeskCNC.

If you need to handle other 3D file formats, or want to design
organic surfaces, you should also consider VectorCam. It has an
integrated Nurbs based surface modeler and Cam capability, includes
lathe, mill, and 4 axis wire EDM, editor and serial communications
for about 1/2 of the price of Visualmill-basic and Rhino.

Also if you are a student there are even better Vector discounts on
our web site.

Best Regards,

Fred Smith - IMService

hobby discounts are at http://www.imsrv.com/hobby/grp.html

We are THE source for low cost cadcam.

Discussion Thread

washcomp 2003-03-04 19:16:01 UTC Visual Mill vs. MACH1 Robert Campbell 2003-03-04 19:35:32 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Visual Mill vs. MACH1 ballendo 2003-03-05 06:28:52 UTC CAD CAM 101 was Re: Visual Mill vs. MACH1 Tony Jeffree 2003-03-05 06:52:36 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CAD CAM 101 was Re: Visual Mill vs. MACH1 Robert Campbell 2003-03-05 07:09:59 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Visual Mill vs. MACH1 Jeff Goldberg 2003-03-05 08:13:49 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Visual Mill vs. MACH1 Fred Smith 2003-03-05 08:47:17 UTC Re: Visual Mill vs. MACH1 Tim Goldstein 2003-03-05 11:01:19 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Visual Mill vs. MACH1