Re: Visual Mill vs. MACH1
Posted by
Fred Smith
on 2003-03-05 08:47:17 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Jeff Goldberg" <jeff@w...>
wrote:
Look at DeskCNC as well as Mach1. DeskCNC has many CAM functions as
well as the controller capabilities.
On the CAM Side, it will import 2D DXF for pocketing and contouring
or 3D STL for swoopy surfacesfrom your CAD design program, as well
as process images(from files or scan direct) to make 2D tracings for
engraving and 3D height field carvings. It also includes Tru-type
font engraving.
http://www.imsrv.com/deskcnc
The controller is based on EMC syntax and has an editor and
simulator built in. There is also support for contact probe scanning.
One good feature is that it does not require a high powered computer
to run. It accomplishes machine control via a serial port interface
with the realtime processes on an inexpensive external board ($50,
and yes I have about 6 left that are free). Most any computer that
will run Windows 95 or later will run DeskCNC.
If you need to handle other 3D file formats, or want to design
organic surfaces, you should also consider VectorCam. It has an
integrated Nurbs based surface modeler and Cam capability, includes
lathe, mill, and 4 axis wire EDM, editor and serial communications
for about 1/2 of the price of Visualmill-basic and Rhino.
Also if you are a student there are even better Vector discounts on
our web site.
Best Regards,
Fred Smith - IMService
hobby discounts are at http://www.imsrv.com/hobby/grp.html
We are THE source for low cost cadcam.
wrote:
> Great question! Short answer - I don't know. Is Visual Mill 3.0(Free
> version) sufficient for the CAM function on a 3 axis Bridgeport?I'd like
> to keep the software cost as low as possible until I get familiarwith what
> this beast will do.Jeff,
>
Look at DeskCNC as well as Mach1. DeskCNC has many CAM functions as
well as the controller capabilities.
On the CAM Side, it will import 2D DXF for pocketing and contouring
or 3D STL for swoopy surfacesfrom your CAD design program, as well
as process images(from files or scan direct) to make 2D tracings for
engraving and 3D height field carvings. It also includes Tru-type
font engraving.
http://www.imsrv.com/deskcnc
The controller is based on EMC syntax and has an editor and
simulator built in. There is also support for contact probe scanning.
One good feature is that it does not require a high powered computer
to run. It accomplishes machine control via a serial port interface
with the realtime processes on an inexpensive external board ($50,
and yes I have about 6 left that are free). Most any computer that
will run Windows 95 or later will run DeskCNC.
If you need to handle other 3D file formats, or want to design
organic surfaces, you should also consider VectorCam. It has an
integrated Nurbs based surface modeler and Cam capability, includes
lathe, mill, and 4 axis wire EDM, editor and serial communications
for about 1/2 of the price of Visualmill-basic and Rhino.
Also if you are a student there are even better Vector discounts on
our web site.
Best Regards,
Fred Smith - IMService
hobby discounts are at http://www.imsrv.com/hobby/grp.html
We are THE source for low cost cadcam.
Discussion Thread
washcomp
2003-03-04 19:16:01 UTC
Visual Mill vs. MACH1
Robert Campbell
2003-03-04 19:35:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Visual Mill vs. MACH1
ballendo
2003-03-05 06:28:52 UTC
CAD CAM 101 was Re: Visual Mill vs. MACH1
Tony Jeffree
2003-03-05 06:52:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CAD CAM 101 was Re: Visual Mill vs. MACH1
Robert Campbell
2003-03-05 07:09:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Visual Mill vs. MACH1
Jeff Goldberg
2003-03-05 08:13:49 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Visual Mill vs. MACH1
Fred Smith
2003-03-05 08:47:17 UTC
Re: Visual Mill vs. MACH1
Tim Goldstein
2003-03-05 11:01:19 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Visual Mill vs. MACH1