Re: Conversational CNC Programming
Posted by
colin_jet
on 2003-06-10 16:56:21 UTC
Except of course that the conversational programming doesn't have to
be done on the machine itself, although I know that's what the
thread so far has been discussing.
The home user might well use the same PC to interactively write a
simple g-code sequence and then load up something like Mach2 to run
it. An industry user could produce the toolpath on an "office" PC
and then download to the machine tool rather than use a CAM program
for a simple sequence.
If you just want to surface a block, cut a couple of pockets and
drill a few holes, this has to be quicker than a CAM program and its
associated CAD drawing.
Just my thoughts.
Colin
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Raymond Heckert" <jnr@a...>
wrote:
be done on the machine itself, although I know that's what the
thread so far has been discussing.
The home user might well use the same PC to interactively write a
simple g-code sequence and then load up something like Mach2 to run
it. An industry user could produce the toolpath on an "office" PC
and then download to the machine tool rather than use a CAM program
for a simple sequence.
If you just want to surface a block, cut a couple of pockets and
drill a few holes, this has to be quicker than a CAM program and its
associated CAD drawing.
Just my thoughts.
Colin
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Raymond Heckert" <jnr@a...>
wrote:
> What you're describing fits the definition of 'conversationalprogramming'.
> Now, while I haven't been everywhere, it *has* been my experiencethat
> off-line programming is more time/cost effective. Picture it as;the
> machine is capable of producing parts at a rate of 3 to 4 hundreddollars
> (US) per hour (and, indeed considerably more, in some cases). Theoperator
> is getting probably $16 to $20 per hour - if he (okay, or she) isa real
> Cracker-Jack. Anyways, why would you employ that operator to spenda half
> hour programming a complex part that could have been programmedoff-line by
> a programmer making, perhaps $20 to $24 per hour, but, in themeantime, the
> machine could be EARNING several hundreds of dollars in thatamount of
> time? At least that's been my experience with "conversationalprogramming'
> in a production, job-shop. It might work okay for Home ShopMachinists,
> though. Anybody else have thoughts on this? Or is this borderingon O-T?
> (Or is it a case of, "If you have to ask, it is")?a "real"
>
> RayHex
>
> ----------
> > From: forumtvm <forumtvm@y...>
> snip
> >
> > What I am trying to get is a "video" of someone action on
> > CNC machine with a controller on conversational programming.What
> > does he do? Does he, like described above, have an interfacewhere he
> > respond to queries and have the "conversational program"generate an
> > NC program which he will then have to feed to a controller torun it,
> > or does he run it like MDI except it is not blocks like G00 X5,etc.
> > Sorry, just hoping to visualise what exactly is conversational
> > programming.
Discussion Thread
stevenson_engineers
2003-06-08 03:46:29 UTC
Conversational CNC Programming
wayne_j_hill
2003-06-08 07:41:58 UTC
Re: Conversational CNC Programming
forumtvm
2003-06-08 14:14:09 UTC
Re: Conversational CNC Programming
Mark Thomas
2003-06-08 19:06:08 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Conversational CNC Programming
forumtvm
2003-06-09 09:57:50 UTC
Re: Conversational CNC Programming
Mark Thomas
2003-06-09 10:23:55 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Conversational CNC Programming
Raymond Heckert
2003-06-10 16:26:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Conversational CNC Programming
colin_jet
2003-06-10 16:56:21 UTC
Re: Conversational CNC Programming
Fred Smith
2003-06-10 18:43:06 UTC
Re: Conversational CNC Programming
doug98105
2003-06-10 23:27:50 UTC
Re: Conversational CNC Programming
forumtvm
2003-06-11 08:01:53 UTC
Re: Conversational CNC Programming