Re: Blown Gecko 340
Posted by
andyolney
on 2003-06-16 21:19:55 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Jon Elson <elson@p...> wrote:
motor, but am not positive. don't have time tonight to test the motor.
Thanks for your help. Andy
> >repaired
> >~~~~ 36VDC. Should have plenty of head room here.
> >
> Yup, clearly LOTS of head room. I'm starting to think it may be a
> bad motor with an intermittent short. Just another thought, is this
> the SAME gecko drive that was repaired before? Maybe there is an
> intermittent problem in the control logic that was not fully
> before?I don't think it is the same drive, but I believe it is the same
>
> Jon
motor, but am not positive. don't have time tonight to test the motor.
Thanks for your help. Andy
Discussion Thread
andyolney
2003-06-15 21:16:06 UTC
Blown Gecko 340
JanRwl@A...
2003-06-15 22:19:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Blown Gecko 340
Jon Elson
2003-06-15 22:28:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Blown Gecko 340
andyolney
2003-06-16 09:10:18 UTC
Re: Blown Gecko 340
Jon Elson
2003-06-16 10:34:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Blown Gecko 340
andyolney
2003-06-16 21:19:55 UTC
Re: Blown Gecko 340
andyolney
2003-06-17 22:53:03 UTC
Re: Blown Gecko 340
Lee Studley
2003-06-18 10:17:32 UTC
Re: Blown Gecko 340
Jon Elson
2003-06-18 10:50:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Blown Gecko 340
andyolney
2003-06-22 15:34:39 UTC
Re: Blown Gecko 340 Update
Jon Elson
2003-06-27 20:26:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Blown Gecko 340 Update
andyolney
2003-06-27 22:04:43 UTC
Re: Blown Gecko 340 Update
Lee Studley
2003-06-27 23:35:05 UTC
Re: Blown Gecko 340 Update
Dan Mauch
2003-07-14 10:51:50 UTC
Interesting problem
Fred Smith
2003-07-14 15:18:27 UTC
Re: Interesting problem
stevenson_engineers
2003-07-14 17:31:43 UTC
Re: Interesting problem