CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: Rong Fu RF-45 versus Birmingham YRF-45

on 2003-07-25 07:39:47 UTC
> Well just some thought to throw into the aquations there are
> certainly other considerations too.
> Good Luck

some people might think you're all wet (snicker) but you are correct
that some thinking is needed.

is the machine better than you expected ? is this machine in near
perfect conditon and with mounting plate locations and with perfect
dovetails ?

It is possible that this machine is just all put together correctly
and is a better base than a RF.

Call the customer service as shipping is not cheap and you may be the
one paying to return it and to get the new RF. maybe get them to
toss in a bunch of MT arbor threaded adapters for their mistake ?
(I'd go for the list price of adapters equal to return shipping costs)

every time the R8 vs the MT discussion come up, there is no clear
winner.

The question about this machine might be "is THIS better for the
purpose?"

Dave

Discussion Thread

sinecyan 2003-07-24 23:56:02 UTC Rong Fu RF-45 versus Birmingham YRF-45 David A. Frantz 2003-07-25 02:34:00 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Rong Fu RF-45 versus Birmingham YRF-45 Torsten 2003-07-25 03:35:24 UTC Re: Rong Fu RF-45 versus Birmingham YRF-45 turbulatordude 2003-07-25 07:39:47 UTC Re: Rong Fu RF-45 versus Birmingham YRF-45 Jon Elson 2003-07-25 10:08:28 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Rong Fu RF-45 versus Birmingham YRF-45 Jon Elson 2003-07-25 10:16:11 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Rong Fu RF-45 versus Birmingham YRF-45 dro_guy 2003-07-25 21:31:29 UTC Re: Rong Fu RF-45 versus Birmingham YRF-45