CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Does this make sense? was Re:BentNookballscrews ?????

Posted by Kim Lux
on 2003-08-12 14:25:09 UTC
See below.


On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 15:13, Carlos Guillermo wrote:
> Kim -
>
> So then by your wheel bearing example, if I adjust my wheel
> bearings for 50 lbs of axial preload, then it would take an extra
> 50 lbs per wheel to roll the car?

By my calcs, it would take 500 lbs/31 inlb per lb = 16 in lb. The ratio
of force to torque for a 5 TPI ball screw is about 31 lbs / in lb.

> I'm not disputing that the drag
> increases, but it is certainly not 1-to-1, and you must take into
> account the moment arm length. You hit it on the head, though:
> The drag force is roughly PROPORTIONAL to the preload, and the
> proportion would be a function of the efficiency of the rolling
> elements.
>
> According to the formula that you read:
>
> Td = (Kp*P*L) / (2*3.14),
>
> where:
> Td = preload drag torque (Kgf-mm)
> Kp = preload torque coefficient = typically between 0.1 and 0.3,
> I'll use 0.2

The docs that I've read use a ball screw efficiency of 0.9 or 90%. Here
is the difference between our arguments.

torque = force/(2 pi x TPI x eff) = force/ (31.4 x .9) for a 5 TPI ball
screw.

The difference between our equations is that I am using 0.9 and you are
using 0.1 to 0.3 ???? We both agree there is drag due to the preload
and we are using the same equation, with different co efficients.


> P = preload force (Kgf)
> L = lead (mm)
>
> Then:
> For a 5mm lead screw with a 250 Kgf preload between ballnuts:
>
> Td = (0.2*250*5) / (2*3.14)
> = 39.8Kgf-mm
> = 0.390 N-m
> = 55.3 in-oz
> = 3.45 in-lb
>
> This torque would be a small fraction of the peak torque available
> from the motors of a medium-sized mill.

Depends on the motor. The Camtronics are rated at 600 oz in peak. I
call that 120 oz in continuous. 3.45 in lb = 55.2 oz in, which is 46%
of their continuous capacity.




> I'm done.
>
> Regards,
>
> Carlos Guillermo
> VERVE Engineering & Design
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kim Lux [mailto:lux@...]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 1:32 PM
> To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Does this make sense? was
> Re:BentNookballscrews ?????
>
> Yes, I read them and I fully understand them.
>
> Did you ever replace the wheel bearings in a car ? The two
> bearings act
> the very same way as the ball nuts do on a ball screw. When you
> tighten
> the preload the drag increases. The amount the drag increase is
> proportional to the preload and in our case, with a 5 TPI ball
> screw,
> the torque required in inlbs is 1/31st of the preload in pounds.
>
> Have you guys ever actually worked with a ballscrew and ballnuts,
> applying preload ? I've set up 6 axes in the last few weeks.
>
> Kim
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@..., timg@...
> Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... [Moderators]
> URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto: aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if you have trouble.
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>
> NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> bill
> List Mom
> List Owner
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
--
Kim Lux <lux@...>

Discussion Thread

Jon Elson 2003-08-12 11:04:59 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Does this make sense? was Re: Bent Nookballscrews ????? Bill Kichman 2003-08-12 12:16:36 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Does this make sense? was Re: Bent Nookballscrews ????? Kim Lux 2003-08-12 12:43:20 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Does this make sense? was Re: Bent Nookballscrews ????? Carlos Guillermo 2003-08-12 13:20:32 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Does this make sense? was Re:Bent Nookballscrews ????? Kim Lux 2003-08-12 13:32:04 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Does this make sense? was Re:Bent Nookballscrews ????? Carlos Guillermo 2003-08-12 14:16:21 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Does this make sense? was Re:BentNookballscrews ????? Kim Lux 2003-08-12 14:25:09 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Does this make sense? was Re:BentNookballscrews ????? Carlos Guillermo 2003-08-12 14:37:39 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Does this make sense? wasRe:BentNookballscrews ????? Vince Negrete 2003-08-12 15:24:28 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Does this make sense? was Re:BentNookballscrews ????? Kim Lux 2003-08-12 16:28:11 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Does this make sense? was Re:BentNookballscrews ????? Raymond Heckert 2003-08-12 19:16:39 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Does this make sense? wasRe:BentNookballscrews ????? Carlos Guillermo 2003-08-12 19:36:54 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Does this make sense? wasRe:BentNookballscrews ????? Vince Negrete 2003-08-12 22:09:43 UTC Does this make sense? wasRe:BentNookballscrews ????? Jon Elson 2003-08-12 22:42:13 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Does this make sense? wasRe:BentNookballscrews ?????