Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: mill drill conversion
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2003-09-10 09:51:01 UTC
jroark31 wrote:
is the peak torque, it will likely be enough. 100 IPM requires 500 RPM
on the screw, so a 3:1 belt ratio would still allow you to reach that speed.
With 3:1 reduction, you get 430 * 3 = 1290 Oz-In at the screw. That
is 80.6 Lb-In. That will produce 2535 Lbs of linear force at the machine
slide! You say you need MORE than a TON?!!!
Jon
>I will be replacing the ACME screw with ball screws .2 lead. IIf the 430 Oz-In is continuous, that will be more than enough. Even if that
>would really like to be able to cut wood and plastic at 60ipm max
>and rapid around 100ipm. I would also like to cut Aluminum and Steel
>(much slower). I currently have 3 servo motors peek torque of
>430oz_in 1700rpm I am using Gecko G320 drives.
>
is the peak torque, it will likely be enough. 100 IPM requires 500 RPM
on the screw, so a 3:1 belt ratio would still allow you to reach that speed.
With 3:1 reduction, you get 430 * 3 = 1290 Oz-In at the screw. That
is 80.6 Lb-In. That will produce 2535 Lbs of linear force at the machine
slide! You say you need MORE than a TON?!!!
Jon
Discussion Thread
jroark31
2003-09-09 07:45:30 UTC
mill drill conversion
Jon Elson
2003-09-09 10:09:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mill drill conversion
jroark31
2003-09-10 07:38:01 UTC
Re: mill drill conversion
Jon Elson
2003-09-10 09:51:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: mill drill conversion
Kim Lux
2003-09-10 10:00:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: mill drill conversion
Torsten
2003-09-10 12:22:02 UTC
Re: mill drill conversion
Chris Baugher
2003-09-10 12:29:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: mill drill conversion
Kim Lux
2003-09-10 13:02:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: mill drill conversion