Re: Where should I head on a probe? (Was:Digitizer probe progress)
Posted by
Fred Smith
on 2003-09-28 08:10:45 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "washcomp" <jeff@w...> wrote:
http://www.imsrv.com/deskcnc/probe.htm
It is also additionally discounted with purchase of our new Servo
retrofit kit ($150 with kit purchase) Information about this
offering is at:
http://www.cadcamcadcam.com/deskcnc/DeskCNC%20kitsa.htm
precision parts. You can measure once and cut twice or measure twice
and cut once.
Since it also includes CAM functions, it will also create tool radius
compensated toolpaths to re-machine a duplicate, without resorting to
any external software.
most decent Cad-Cam systems (like Vector Cad-Cam). It can also be
converted to DXF and many other common 3D surface formats with
Accutrans.
intervention (like positioning to the center of a hole and using 3
point arc contact, to determine the center and radius). It does not
lend itself to automation and cannot automatically handle hole
tolerance. The probe cannot tell that a 1/4 hole is to be reamed vs
drilled or tapped. It is usualy faster to use a caliper and measure
the part than to install the probe in the toolholder and spindle, jog
to position and then precisely record each hole feature data.
Calipers only cost about $20-$50 so the efficiency is in the manual
technique. However measuring a complex 3D surface is another
matter. Hence the DeskCNC probing system.
Best Regards, Fred Smith- IMService
Listserve Special discounts and offers are at:
http://www.imsrv.com/hobby
We are THE source for low cost Cad Cam
> Now that I understaand the flexability of a probe (thanks toand/or
> Graham), it has landed on my "to do" list of things to obtain
> build. So I've got some questions:The DeskCNC probe is available for $275.00 with DeskCNC.
>
> 1) Where do you find a probe or what major components for a home
> built one are redily available?
http://www.imsrv.com/deskcnc/probe.htm
It is also additionally discounted with purchase of our new Servo
retrofit kit ($150 with kit purchase) Information about this
offering is at:
http://www.cadcamcadcam.com/deskcnc/DeskCNC%20kitsa.htm
> 2) OK, lets say a probe is obtained/built. Grahams process toto
> digitize an object is clever and works, but an easier way with less
> steps would be more useful for mear mortals like me. The ability
> find the boundries of a piece of material (for use as a referenceYou cannot eliminate measurement from the process of creating
> point) would be helpful most CNC programs (MACH2 for example). I
> may be wrong, but it should remove the requirement to hand measure
> everything when beginning a new project.
precision parts. You can measure once and cut twice or measure twice
and cut once.
> 3) While I understand that tool paths will not be optomized, andDeskCNC will create an .STL surface file from a probed surface.
> tools/feeds/speeds will have to be hand entered, it would offer the
> oportunity for a CNC program to act as a duplicator.
Since it also includes CAM functions, it will also create tool radius
compensated toolpaths to re-machine a duplicate, without resorting to
any external software.
> CAD) level, since only the CNC software has the ability to controlre-
> the tool, this is the only loigical place to start. The ability to
> export the probed grid in a couple of popular formats for importing
> into CAM packages (DXF, etc.) may be helpful for those people who
> prefer to use their CAM software for better optimization and then
> import back into the CNC system.DeskCNC will export the data as an STL format. This is usable by
most decent Cad-Cam systems (like Vector Cad-Cam). It can also be
converted to DXF and many other common 3D surface formats with
Accutrans.
> What are proples views on the above and where do you think I shouldThe probing of 2D is basic math and can be accomplished with manual
> be heading/looking from this perspective.
intervention (like positioning to the center of a hole and using 3
point arc contact, to determine the center and radius). It does not
lend itself to automation and cannot automatically handle hole
tolerance. The probe cannot tell that a 1/4 hole is to be reamed vs
drilled or tapped. It is usualy faster to use a caliper and measure
the part than to install the probe in the toolholder and spindle, jog
to position and then precisely record each hole feature data.
Calipers only cost about $20-$50 so the efficiency is in the manual
technique. However measuring a complex 3D surface is another
matter. Hence the DeskCNC probing system.
Best Regards, Fred Smith- IMService
Listserve Special discounts and offers are at:
http://www.imsrv.com/hobby
We are THE source for low cost Cad Cam
Discussion Thread
Graham Stabler
2003-09-24 13:31:08 UTC
Digitizer probe progress
Wayne C. Gramlich
2003-09-25 21:10:40 UTC
Re: Digitizer probe progress
Graham Stabler
2003-09-26 02:55:42 UTC
Re: Digitizer probe progress
ccq@x...
2003-09-26 07:08:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Digitizer probe progress
Graham Stabler
2003-09-26 08:33:12 UTC
Re: Digitizer probe progress
tomp_tag
2003-09-27 07:24:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Digitizer probe progress
Wayne C. Gramlich
2003-09-27 12:30:03 UTC
Re: Digitizer probe progress
Graham Stabler
2003-09-27 16:02:52 UTC
Re: Digitizer probe progress
washcomp
2003-09-28 07:31:19 UTC
Where should I head on a probe? (Was:Digitizer probe progress)
Fred Smith
2003-09-28 08:10:45 UTC
Re: Where should I head on a probe? (Was:Digitizer probe progress)
Tim Goldstein
2003-09-28 10:30:30 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Where should I head on a probe? (Was:Digitizer probe progress)
Fred Smith
2003-09-28 11:55:51 UTC
Re: Where should I head on a probe? (Was:Digitizer probe progress)
Tim Goldstein
2003-09-28 13:45:49 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Where should I head on a probe? (Was:Digitizer probe progress)
Graham Stabler
2003-09-28 15:56:15 UTC
Re: Where should I head on a probe? (Was:Digitizer probe progress)
Bob Bachman
2003-10-09 20:26:46 UTC
Generating a Sphere
Fred Smith
2003-10-09 21:00:15 UTC
Re: Generating a Sphere
doug98105
2003-10-09 22:11:11 UTC
Re: Generating a Sphere
Michael Milligan
2003-10-09 23:39:19 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Generating a Sphere
Marcus and Eva
2003-10-10 08:05:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Generating a Sphere
Elliot Burke
2003-10-10 12:56:07 UTC
RE: Generating a Sphere
Bob Bachman
2003-10-13 18:00:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Generating a Sphere